12.10.2013 Views

JOURNAL OF EURASIAN STUDIES

JOURNAL OF EURASIAN STUDIES

JOURNAL OF EURASIAN STUDIES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

October-December 2009 <strong>JOURNAL</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>EURASIAN</strong> <strong>STUDIES</strong> Volume I., Issue 4.<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

these terms are included in the same language family. The language of the Huns has been compared<br />

mainly with Mongolian and Turkic. The Hun words that can be found in Chinese chronicles have been<br />

reconstructed on this basis. Siratori was the first to take up this question. After him, several sinologists<br />

tried to do the same thing. Pulleybank and Ligeti hypothesized that the Hun language survived in the<br />

small languages of Siberia. Of course in the Siberian languages, Hun words may appear because these<br />

peoples were also part of the Hun Empire. This theory is easy to falsify, however, because the so-called<br />

Hun words in these small Siberian languages also appear in Mongolian and Turkic. This is not<br />

surprising because the Huns dominated the whole of the northern territories as well. Hence, aspects of<br />

their language are preserved by the peoples from this area as well. Recent linguistic research<br />

unambiguously demonstrates that Ancient Turkic and Ancient Mongolian are rooted in the age of the<br />

Hun Empire and that the Hun language was the ancestor of languages presently spoken in Eurasia.<br />

The heritage of the Huns can be found all over the Steppes of Inner Asia. The sacred places of the<br />

Huns were adopted by the peoples succeeding them. Batsaihan refers to the fact that the holy mountains<br />

of the Mongols, including Burkan-Kaldun, Otgon-tenger and Silin-bogd, might have been ancient ritual<br />

centers of the Huns. It is uncertain whether these places were used by the Huns, who became<br />

independent in the first century A.D., or whether these cult places are much older, maybe originating in<br />

the Bronze Age. The historic continuity is even observed in the case of some of the towns. The Hun town<br />

of Gua-Doc was first conquered by the Turkic tribes and then by the Mongols. In this town, Genghis<br />

Khan had a palace-residence and the diets electing a new khan were held in this town. The valley of the<br />

Central Mongolian Orhon River was first a center of the Hun rulers. Afterwards, it served the same<br />

purpose for the Turkic and Uygur rulers. From 1220, it was the seat of Genghis Khan. There is still a lot<br />

of research going on in order to find the seat of Atilla in the Carpathian Basin. It is documented that the<br />

ancient seat of the Hungarian kings of the Árpád Dynasty, the so-called White Castle that was based on a<br />

Roman fortification, was located somewhere in the Pilis Mountain area. The early Hungarian chronicler,<br />

Anonymus, has written about this. Of course the seat of Atilla or his summer residence could have been<br />

somewhere else, maybe in the region between the Danube and the Tisza Rivers, where the Avars settled<br />

and, later, the dynastic center of the Magyars was erected. In Transylvania, the oral tradition informs us<br />

about Budvár (Budcastle), near Székelyudvarhely that was one of the centers of the Huns, after the Huns<br />

moved from Wallachia toward Transylvania.<br />

A number of eastern researchers hold the opinion that the Turkic peoples inherited a coherent system<br />

of runic writing. Hence, the system must be much older than the Turkic peoples themselves. A lot of<br />

short runes have survived in Hun excavations and rock paintings. These runes have been collected by<br />

several Mongolian researchers, like Csuluunbaatar, Szumiyabaatar and Batsaihan. The latter compared<br />

the Hun runic writing with the Chinese Yin-Zhou script and he discovered a number of similarities.<br />

Most of the Mongol researchers have adopted the results of Perlee, who states that the runic writing<br />

originates from cattle-branding. The Hun writing system seems to be the result of an internal<br />

development in any case. It can not be a borrowing from abroad. The signs of the writing may be<br />

different, depending on time and space, due to the enormous territory, in which they lived. The runic<br />

writing is used today in daily life by two peoples, the Hungarians in the Carpathian Basin and the<br />

Crimean Tatars. For the latter, the runic writing functions as a bringer of good luck or as a preventer of<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

© Copyright Mikes International 2001-2009 162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!