14.10.2013 Views

CASSAVA OPPORTUNTIES IN NIGERIA - FAO.org

CASSAVA OPPORTUNTIES IN NIGERIA - FAO.org

CASSAVA OPPORTUNTIES IN NIGERIA - FAO.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Such calculations are used on a daily if not hourly<br />

basis to determine the appropriate mix of inputs<br />

for commercial operators.<br />

It has been said that the price of cassava must<br />

represent 80 percent of the price of maize for it to<br />

be competitive. Other benchmark prices may also<br />

exist but using this one, Figure 4-5 illustrates<br />

those states where cassava is competitive and<br />

those where it is not.<br />

Figure 4-5 Cassava-Maize Price Ratio and Cassava<br />

Production<br />

The dots in this figure represent the cassava price<br />

ratio to maize. The horizontal line represents the<br />

80 percent benchmark. Those states whose dot is<br />

above the line are said to be uncompetitive at the<br />

time of review (using 2000 prices) and those<br />

states whose dot is below the line are said to be<br />

competitive. Coupled with the level of cassava<br />

production in each state (the bars) one can<br />

quickly see those states that have an advantage<br />

in cassava production, processing and utilization.<br />

Cross river, Rivers, Enugu, Imo, Kogi and Kaduna<br />

all appear to be strong contenders barring other<br />

considerations such as resources in land, labour,<br />

water, etc.<br />

4.2 FUTURE TARGETS<br />

There are two future price and margin targets for<br />

Nigeria to strive for. The first is a short-term target<br />

that lowers domestic costs of production and final<br />

prices to remain competitive against internal<br />

competition. The second, a long-term target, that<br />

lowers the costs of production and final prices to<br />

attain international competitiveness.<br />

21<br />

In the case of the first target, it is the impression<br />

that cassava has only been used by industry<br />

when maize or wheat prices were high. Potential<br />

users of cassava do not generally talk of using<br />

cassava because the price is low. There is a need<br />

to achieve lower cassava prices so that cassava<br />

is used because its price is competitive.<br />

In most instances the competitive price for<br />

cassava is the price of imported replaceable<br />

commodities. The primary candidates for<br />

replacement are maize, wheat flour, ethanol and<br />

starch. It is assumed that cassava chips or pellets<br />

could be competitive with maize and it is also<br />

assumed that cassava chips would be produced<br />

in the Thai manner with a 1 to 2.5 ratio of chips to<br />

roots. The conversion factor in this table also<br />

includes the aforementioned 80 percent factor<br />

(3.125=2.5/.80). Cassava flour is assumed to be<br />

the prime commodity to compete with imported<br />

wheat and wheat flour in the bakery, confectionary<br />

and flour milling industries. Fresh cassava is<br />

assumed to be the primary input for the<br />

production of ethanol. Finally, cassava starch<br />

could compete with imported starches.<br />

The following table indicates the range of these<br />

prices (high and low) and converts them to a naira<br />

value (the last column of the table). This value<br />

provides an indication of the target price (roots<br />

plus processing) that would make cassava and<br />

cassava products competitive.<br />

For example, it would appear that cassava chips<br />

or pellets could be competitive with maize if the<br />

cost of cassava roots and processing was in the<br />

range of N6 550 to N12 254. Obviously when<br />

maize prices are low the cost of roots and<br />

processing has to be at the lower price range.<br />

For cassava to be competitive in the ethanol and<br />

starch industries, the cost of cassava roots and<br />

processing should be in the range of N11 213 and<br />

N18 860.<br />

When attempting to identify the relative<br />

importance of these target prices it should be<br />

recalled that the cost of processing cassava<br />

differs greatly between the industries. Ethanol<br />

processing is probably the highest cost industry<br />

followed by starch – at least the production of high<br />

quality modified starch.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!