15.10.2013 Views

Submission to the Review of Indexation Arrangements in Australian ...

Submission to the Review of Indexation Arrangements in Australian ...

Submission to the Review of Indexation Arrangements in Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>in</strong>come taper cuts <strong>of</strong>f at an annual <strong>in</strong>come <strong>of</strong> approximately $39,507. That is, an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual (who is not a member <strong>of</strong> a couple) with an annual PSS or CSS pension <strong>of</strong><br />

under $39,500 would receive a part-rate Age Pension, provided <strong>the</strong>y had no o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>in</strong>come and assets below <strong>the</strong> asset test threshold. In this context, Table 3 shows that<br />

some 89% <strong>of</strong> civilian superannuation pensions at 30 June 2007 were below $40,000<br />

per annum.<br />

A separate test applies for couples. The maximum rate <strong>of</strong> pension for 20 March <strong>to</strong><br />

19 September 2008 is $456.80 for each member <strong>of</strong> a couple (or around $11,876 per<br />

annum). Where a couple did not have o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>come and had assets below <strong>the</strong> assets<br />

test threshold, <strong>the</strong> couple would receive an Age Pension <strong>of</strong> approximately $23,752 per<br />

annum.<br />

Where one member <strong>of</strong> a couple had a PSS or CSS pension <strong>of</strong> $10,000 per annum <strong>the</strong><br />

annual part-rate Age Pension payment would be approximately $22,250 per annum<br />

(comb<strong>in</strong>ed). 25 If one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> couple had an annual PSS or CSS pension <strong>of</strong> $20,000 <strong>the</strong><br />

annual part-rate Age Pension payment would be approximately $18,250 per annum<br />

(comb<strong>in</strong>ed). Where a couple receives an annual PSS or CSS pension <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately $66,000 or more <strong>the</strong>re would be no payment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Age Pension.<br />

Chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> superannuation pension <strong>in</strong>dexation method<br />

Chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dexation method for pensions <strong>to</strong> a higher rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dexation, will<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease pensions payable over time. However, for those civilian scheme pensioners<br />

who do qualify for a part-rate Age Pension, <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>in</strong>come would not <strong>in</strong>crease by<br />

<strong>the</strong> full <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pension, as <strong>the</strong>re would be a reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir part-rate Age<br />

Pension because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> taper rate for <strong>the</strong> Age Pension.<br />

The <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>in</strong>come benefit <strong>in</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dexation method for superannuation<br />

pensions would, <strong>the</strong>refore, be greater for those CSS and PSS members with<br />

superannuation pensions that exceed <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come test threshold. It would also be<br />

greater for those members receiv<strong>in</strong>g a CSS or PSS pension that is less than $138 a<br />

fortnight for a s<strong>in</strong>gle person. This latter category is likely <strong>to</strong> be people who did not<br />

have a long period <strong>of</strong> employment with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> Government. Table 3 shows<br />

that <strong>the</strong>se two categories <strong>of</strong> members comprise a small proportion <strong>of</strong> all civilian<br />

superannuation pensions.<br />

25 This assumes that <strong>the</strong> couple had no o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>come, and had assets below <strong>the</strong> asset test threshold.<br />

Page 18 <strong>of</strong> 28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!