Soldier Of Truth In A Lifelong Battle With Lies - Four Winds 10

Washington metropolitan area, and two
additional offices in other geographic
locations within the United States, with
the capability supporting deployment
operations in the event that one area is
incapacitated.”
The real purpose of the Standby
Program was made clear to potential
contractors at a meeting held on July 10
at the Department of Education
headquarters in Washington.
FEMA officials met with the
representatives of firms seeking the bids.
Approximately 100 people attended the
meeting.
FEMA officials made very clear that
the purpose of one of the most massive
undertakings in the agency’s history was
to prepare for potential mass
destruction attacks on U.S. cities.
Sources who attended the meeting tell
NewsMax that most of the meeting dealt
with how the firms should handle
biological, chemical, and nuclear
disasters.
After he had reviewed the NewsMax
story, I again chatted with Mr. Kolton. He
identified the factual “inaccuracies” in
NewsMax’s story.
One was that NewsMax reported the
contracted firms need to be prepared for
creating such cities by January of next
year. Mr. Kolton said the firms only need
to be hired by January of 2003.
NewsMax reported that FEMA told
contractors it had ordered tents and
trailers for temporary housing. Mr. Kolton
said the tents and trailers have not been
purchased yet. (That may be the case, but
FEMA does currently possess tents and
trailers for disaster housing.)
These are minor points—and a far cry
from claiming the NewsMax story was
“totally bogus” or “riddled with
inaccuracies” as some members of the
press have been told.
In fact, Mr. Kolton agreed that the
program includes preparation for terrorist
mass destruction attacks, though the
FEMA bid notice specifically avoids
using such language.
He stressed that the Standby Program is
being implemented to prepare for “all
types of disasters” including terrorist
ones.
Asked why the bid notice conveniently
forgot to mention the potential for
terrorism, though it must be among the
highest priorities for FEMA, he again
stressed that the language does include
that possibility—though the program’s
main focus, he said, is on natural
disasters.
What natural disaster had caused such
a need for the largest program of its
kind ever in the history of FEMA?
SEPTEMBER 2002
In decades of emergency response, why,
all of sudden, is FEMA set to spend $300
million just for architects and engineers
over the next five years simply to be on
“standby”?
This $300 million doesn’t include the
probable billions that would be needed
for infrastructure and labor to implement
the emergency cities.
What natural disaster would require
FEMA to create emergency cities in
different geographic areas of the U.S. at
the same time?
Kolton responded that FEMA could
foresee two Category-4 hurricanes
slamming into two distinct parts of the
East Coast at about the same time.
[Editor’s note: Considering the
advanced state of the government’s covert
technical capabilities in weather
modification, FEMA is in a pretty good
position to “foresee” such events!]
The evidence is clear that FEMA is
preparing for mass destruction attacks.
There is nothing wrong with this program,
and in fact, the agency has a duty to
disclose its plans to the public.
Far from panicking the public, I think
the public would be happy to learn that
the U.S. government—our government—is
preparing for potential terrorist acts.
[end quoting]
Well, that’s one way to look at it. We
here at The SPECTRUM doubt “the public
would be happy to learn” who is truly
responsible for the so-called “terrorism”—
whether seemingly “natural” or blamed
on foreign agents—and that so much of
their hard-earned tax dollars are fueling
such diabolical machinery being used
against them.
Be sure to read Eustace Mullins’
comments related to this matter near the
end of his front-page feature interview
with Rick Martin.
ANTI-TERRORIST BILLS:
END THEM —
DON’T AMEND THEM!
From THE STRATEGY, Australia, July
2002: [quoting]
A full-page advertisement in The
Australian for June 12, 2002, p.7,
certainly stirred up a hornets’ nest judging
from the reactions of attorney general
Daryl Williams who described the
comparison with Hitler’s fascist laws as
trying to incite fear in the community.
The full-page advertisement was drawn
together by the CEC (Citizens Electoral
Council) and included concerned
Australians ranging from former Labor
deputy prime minister Jim Cairns,
mainstream journalists, unionists, public
servants and lobbyists, newspaper editors,
lecturers from universities in a wide range
of disciplines, consulting engineers,
Chamber of Commerce members, Shire
Mayors and Presidents, numerous
Councillors, authors, Aboriginal leaders,
film producers, accountants, solicitors
and lawyers etc. etc. and so the list goes
on (ordinary Australians) who condemned
the proposed laws as draconian and
fascist.
We quote from a report in the Brisbane
Courier Mail (BCM) June 13, 2002 which
said:
“But Mr. Williams said last night the
advertisement was ‘misleading, its claims
incorrect, inflammatory and
irresponsible’.
“Mr. Williams said the bills had been
placed under exhaustive scrutiny and had
been amended to give greater safeguards,
and any comparison with Nazi Germany
was ‘highly offensive’.
“ ‘It is extremely disappointing that the
Citizens Electoral Council chooses to
peddle untruths and incite fear in the
community rather than work
constructively with the government to
address any concerns it might have’ Mr.
Williams said.”
The comments might offend Mr.
Williams—but who could believe a
politician’s word? After all, it was Mr.
Williams who organised the legislation
that made any and every Australian gun
owner a criminal and deprived all
Australians of a guaranteed right in the
Bill Of Rights.
Again we quote from the same article in
the BCM: “Social analyst David Chalke,
a consultant with Quantum Research, said
last night that the signatories were ‘the
usual suspects’ and he did not expect the
advertisement to alter government policy
NOTICE REGARDING
CHANGES OF ADDRESS
Subscribers: please be aware that since
switching to the new magazine format
(back in January) we have had to use “Bulk
Rate” mail in order to keep the cost down.
This class of mail is * NOT * forwarded
when you fill out a “Change Of Address”
form at your Post Office.
As the CHANGE OF ADDRESS
information box on page 4 always instructs,
please contact us as soon as possible
when you change your address. That’s the
only way to be sure you’ll receive your
magazine without interruption.
We are sorry, but The SPECTRUM
cannot absorb the additional costs of
replacing missed issues due to not following
this procedure.
We are investigating other mailing options
that could allow for better service should
our financial status improve. Thank you.
— The SPECTRUM
www.TheSpectrumNews.org Toll-free: 1-877-280-2866 Outside U.S.: 1-661-823-9696
PAGE 5