Bachelor Thesis - Christina Kuenen - Hufpfleger

II. LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: imbalance of educations
Figure 2: research approach
Figure 3: distribution of experts' fields of practice
Figure 4: distribution of experts' origin
Figure 5: distribution of practitioners' field of work
Figure 6: distribution of practitioners' origin
Figure 7: experts prefer combination of educations
Figure 8: sum importance scores experts
Figure 9: knowledge experts
Figure 10: additionally mentioned knowledge
Figure 11: authority for examination of alternatives, interview
Figure 12: experts' view into future
Figure 13: practitioners prefer combination of educations
Figure 14: sum importance scores practitioners
Figure 15: knowledge practitioners
Figure 16: authority for examination of alternatives, survey
Figure 17: practitioners' view into future
Figure 18: sum importance total sores
Figure 19: ‘step by step’ model for education
Figure 20: gearwheel drive for quality development
III. LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: cross table of assumptions
Table 2: experts' strengths and problems
Table 3: satisfaction percentage interview
Table 4: median in satisfaction, interview
Table 5: practitioners' strengths and problems
Table 6: satisfaction of practitioners
Table 7: median in satisfaction, survey
Table 8: significant differences within the target groups
Table 9: need for improvement: strengths and problems
Table 10: need and potential for improvement I
Table 11: need and potential for improvement II
8