Bauer, E. and Kohavi, R. (1999), "An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants", Machine Learning, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 105-139. Belousov, A., Verzakov, S. and Von Frese, J. (2002), "A flexible classification approach with optimal generalisation performance: support vector machines", Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 15-25. Belousov, A. I., Verzakov, S. A. and von Frese, J. (2002), "Applicational aspects of support vector machines", Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 16, no. 8-10, pp. 482- 489. Ben-Hur, A. and Weston, J. (2010), "A User's Guide to Support Vector Machines", in Carugo, O. and Eisenhaber, F. (eds.) Humana Press, , pp. 223-239. Bennett, K. P. and Campbell, C. (2003), "Support Vector Machines: Hype or Hallelujah?", SIGKDD Explorations, vol. 2, pp. 2000. Berger, S. I., Iyengar, R. and Ma'ayan, A. (2007), "AVIS: AJAX viewer of interactive signaling networks", Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 20, pp. 2803-2805. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. (2001), "The semantic web", Scientific American, vol. 284, no. 5, pp. 28-37. Berners-Lee, T., ( 1996), WWW: Past, Present, and Future. Berners-Lee, T. and Fischetti, M. (2008), Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by Its Inventor, Paw Prints. Bessant, C., Brereton, R.,G. and Dunkerley, S. (1999), "Integrated processing of triply coupled diode array liquid chromatography electrospray mass spectrometric signals by chemometric methods", Analyst, vol. 124, no. 12, pp. 1733-1744. Boardman, M. and Trappenberg, T. (2006), "A Heuristic for Free Parameter Optimization with Support Vector Machines", Neural Networks, 2006. IJCNN '06. International Joint Conference on, pp. 610. Boser, B. and Vapnik, V. N. (1992), "A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers", Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, , pp. 144-152. Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M. and Vapnik, V. N. (1992), "A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers", Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 144. Bottou, L., Cortes, C., Denker, J. S., Drucker, H., Guyon, I., Jackel, L. D., LeCun, Y., Muller, U. A., Sackinger, E., Simard, P. and Vapnik, V. (1994), "Comparison of classifier methods: a case study in handwritten digit recognition", Pattern Recognition, 1994. Vol. 2 - Conference B: Computer Vision & Image 203
Processing., Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International. Conference on, Vol. 2, pp. 77. Boulesteix, A. -. (2004), "PLS dimension reduction for classification with microarray data", Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology, vol. 3, no. 1. Boulesteix, A. -., Lambert-Lacroix, S., Peyre, J. and Strimmer, K. (2011), plsgenomics: PLS analyses for genomics, available at: http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=plsgenomics. Box, M. J. (1965), "A New Method of Constrained Optimization and a Comparison With Other Methods", The Computer Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 42-52. Bragin, E. (2012), Interactive genome browser based on html5 and related web technologies (Master of Science thesis), Cranfield Univerity, Cranfield Health. Brereton, R. G. (2006), "Consequences of sample size, variable selection, and model validation and optimisation, for predicting classification ability from analytical data", TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1103. Brereton, R. G. (2009), Chemometrics for pattern recognition, Wiley. Brereton, R.G. and Lloyd, G.R., ( 2009), Support Vector Machines for classification and regression, The Royal Society of Chemistry. Burges, C. J. C. (1998), "A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition", Data mining and knowledge discovery, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121-167. Butcher, E. C., Berg, E. L. and Kunkel, E. J. (2004), "Systems biology in drug discovery", Nature biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1253-1259. Byvatov, E. and Schneider, G. (2003), "Support vector machine applications in bioinformatics", Appl Bioinformatics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 67-77. Calì, A., Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G. and Lenzerini, M. (2004), "Data integration under integrity constraints", Information Systems, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 147-163. Canty, A. "An S-Plus Library for Resampling Methods", . Canty, A. and Ripley, B. D. (2012), boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions, . Carney, S. L. (2003), "Leroy Hood expounds the principles, practice and future of systems biology", Drug discovery today, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 436-438. Cawley, G. C. and Talbot, N. L. C. (2007), "Preventing Over-Fitting during Model Selection via Bayesian Regularisation of the Hyper-Parameters", J.Mach.Learn.Res., vol. 8, pp. 841-861. CellML , The CellML project - CellML, available at: http://www.cellml.org. 204
- Page 1 and 2:
CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY Eleni Anthippi
- Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT Muscle foods such as meat,
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........
- Page 7 and 8:
6.2.4 The iWebPlots package .......
- Page 9 and 10:
Figure 3-12 Speedup produced by the
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 6-9 Sweave example for the d
- Page 13 and 14:
TABLE OF EQUATIONS Equation 1 Mean-
- Page 15 and 16:
RMSE RMSECV SSE SVD SVMs SYMBIOSIS-
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1-1 Evolution from molecular
- Page 19 and 20:
1.1.2.1 Fourier Transform Infrared
- Page 21 and 22:
1.1.3 Microbial Spoilage in Meat Sy
- Page 23 and 24:
The multivariate techniques applied
- Page 25 and 26:
1.4 Multivariate Analysis: Unsuperv
- Page 27 and 28:
1.4.2 Cluster Analysis Cluster anal
- Page 29 and 30:
1.5 Multivariate Analysis: Supervis
- Page 31 and 32:
In any linearly separable binary da
- Page 33 and 34:
Where ( ) are the Lagrange multipli
- Page 35 and 36:
Every kernel is characterised by a
- Page 37 and 38:
The “one-against-all” approach
- Page 39 and 40:
Furthermore, metrics such as the bi
- Page 41 and 42:
1.6.3 Leave-One-Out Cross-Validatio
- Page 43 and 44:
In such cases, the model becomes qu
- Page 45 and 46:
1.8 Aims and objectives The overall
- Page 47 and 48:
2 Development of the multivariate a
- Page 49 and 50:
Sensory panel scores were of the hi
- Page 51 and 52:
DF (Hz) 2.2.1.5 Electronic Nose (e-
- Page 53 and 54:
Figure 2-3 Data intersection The fi
- Page 55 and 56:
3. Validation Techniques In the cas
- Page 57 and 58:
Figure 2-4 The process of construct
- Page 59 and 60:
2.3 Results and Discussion 2.3.1 Pr
- Page 61 and 62:
(b) HPLC data (c) e-nose data Figur
- Page 63 and 64:
In the case of FTIR, linear classif
- Page 65 and 66:
2.3.2.2 Class Prediction Accuracies
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 2-7 Class prediction rates o
- Page 69 and 70:
The topology of the three-dimension
- Page 71 and 72:
Figure 2-9 Three-dimensional error
- Page 73 and 74:
Furthermore, a thorough comparison
- Page 75 and 76:
In the master/slave architecture, a
- Page 77 and 78:
precision of the classification acc
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 3-3 The steps of the Nelder-
- Page 81 and 82:
3.3 Results and Discussion 3.3.1 Li
- Page 83 and 84:
3.3.2 Nonlinear Models In order to
- Page 85 and 86:
9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) Figu
- Page 87 and 88:
As an additional visual aid, these
- Page 89 and 90:
a) Number of iterations b) Number o
- Page 91 and 92:
Figure 3-10 Comparison of the execu
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 3-12 Speedup produced by the
- Page 95 and 96:
4 Integration of Heterogeneous Data
- Page 97 and 98:
4.2.2 Procrustes Analysis Procruste
- Page 99 and 100:
symmetric method since the ordering
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 4-3 Steps of CPCA for the da
- Page 103 and 104:
4.2.5 Data Integration and Analysis
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 4-4 Data integration workflo
- Page 107 and 108:
a) GPA b) CPCA Figure 4-6 The conse
- Page 109 and 110:
accuracies as the linear models; po
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 4-8 Classification Results f
- Page 113 and 114:
Similar to FTIR, the PLS-DA ensembl
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 4-9 Class prediction rates o
- Page 117 and 118:
4.3.3 Permutation Tests Even though
- Page 119 and 120:
Even though the interpretation of t
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 4-12 Distribution plots of t
- Page 123 and 124:
RBF SVMs Datasets Original %CC Mean
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 4-14 Boxplots representing t
- Page 127 and 128:
5 Application of the multivariate a
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 5-1 Mean FTIR spectra for ca
- Page 131 and 132:
5.2.2.2 Fourier Transform Infrared
- Page 133 and 134:
5.2.2.4 Data Overview For each expe
- Page 135 and 136:
5.2.3.3 High Throughput Liquid Chro
- Page 137 and 138:
Figure 5-5 displays the PCA scores
- Page 139 and 140:
(a) GPA (b) CPCA Figure 5-6 The con
- Page 141 and 142:
observation confirms that indeed CP
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 5-8 Class prediction rates o
- Page 145 and 146:
(a) RBF SVMs (b) PLS-DA Figure 5-9
- Page 147 and 148:
RBF SVMs Datasets Original %CC Mean
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 5-12 Execution times of the
- Page 151 and 152:
(a) FTIR data (b) Raman data Figure
- Page 153 and 154:
The classification results for the
- Page 155 and 156:
Figure 5-16 Class prediction rates
- Page 157 and 158:
(a) RBF SVMs (b) PLS-DA Figure 5-17
- Page 159 and 160:
RBF SVMs Datasets Original %CC Mean
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 5-20 Execution times of the
- Page 163 and 164:
(a) FTIR data (b) HPLC data 148
- Page 165 and 166:
(a) GPA (b) CPCA Figure 5-22 The co
- Page 167 and 168: The classification results of the f
- Page 169 and 170: Figure 5-24 Classification Results
- Page 171 and 172: Figure 5-25 Class prediction rates
- Page 173 and 174: The permutation results for the dat
- Page 175 and 176: Figure 5-28 Distribution plots of t
- Page 177 and 178: RBF SVMs Datasets Original %CC Mean
- Page 179 and 180: Figure 5-30 Boxplots representing t
- Page 181 and 182: 5.4 Comparison of the individual ca
- Page 183 and 184: Figure 5-32 Investigating the commo
- Page 185 and 186: 6 Development of improved visualisa
- Page 187 and 188: 6.2.2 Generating static graphs As d
- Page 189 and 190: Figure 6-2 Construction process of
- Page 191 and 192: 6.2.2.2 Generating dynamic reports
- Page 193 and 194: activity, while simultaneously the
- Page 195 and 196: or disappeared (Wang et al., 2008).
- Page 197 and 198: ectangles, circles and/or irregular
- Page 199 and 200: In addition to the static figures g
- Page 201 and 202: c) graphics package d) ggplot2 pack
- Page 203 and 204: In addition to aesthetics, faceting
- Page 205 and 206: Datasets FTIR HPLC e-nose PLS-DA (L
- Page 207 and 208: Figure 6-10 Interactive dendrogram
- Page 209 and 210: 6.4 Conclusion The work reported in
- Page 211 and 212: large number of individual models i
- Page 213 and 214: The generated suite of tools, as pr
- Page 215 and 216: In addition, the difficulty to corr
- Page 217: REFERENCES Almeida, J. A. S., Barbo
- Page 221 and 222: Clarke, B., Fokoué, E. and Zhang,
- Page 223 and 224: spectroscopy and machine learning",
- Page 225 and 226: Gower, J. C. (1975), "Generalized p
- Page 227 and 228: Jardon, M. (2006), Systems Biology:
- Page 229 and 230: Nicolaou, N., Xu, Y. and Goodacre,
- Page 231 and 232: Shah, A. A., Barthel, D., Lukasiak,
- Page 233 and 234: Vera, G., Jansen, R. and Suppi, R.
- Page 235: Xu, Y. and Goodacre, R. (2012), "Mu