- Page 1: CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY Eleni Anthippi
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........
- Page 7 and 8: 6.2.4 The iWebPlots package .......
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 3-12 Speedup produced by the
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 6-9 Sweave example for the d
- Page 13 and 14: TABLE OF EQUATIONS Equation 1 Mean-
- Page 15 and 16: RMSE RMSECV SSE SVD SVMs SYMBIOSIS-
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 1-1 Evolution from molecular
- Page 19 and 20: 1.1.2.1 Fourier Transform Infrared
- Page 21 and 22: 1.1.3 Microbial Spoilage in Meat Sy
- Page 23 and 24: The multivariate techniques applied
- Page 25 and 26: 1.4 Multivariate Analysis: Unsuperv
- Page 27 and 28: 1.4.2 Cluster Analysis Cluster anal
- Page 29 and 30: 1.5 Multivariate Analysis: Supervis
- Page 31 and 32: In any linearly separable binary da
- Page 33 and 34: Where ( ) are the Lagrange multipli
- Page 35 and 36: Every kernel is characterised by a
- Page 37 and 38: The “one-against-all” approach
- Page 39 and 40: Furthermore, metrics such as the bi
- Page 41 and 42: 1.6.3 Leave-One-Out Cross-Validatio
- Page 43 and 44: In such cases, the model becomes qu
- Page 45 and 46: 1.8 Aims and objectives The overall
- Page 47 and 48: 2 Development of the multivariate a
- Page 49 and 50: Sensory panel scores were of the hi
- Page 51 and 52: DF (Hz) 2.2.1.5 Electronic Nose (e-
- Page 53 and 54:
Figure 2-3 Data intersection The fi
- Page 55 and 56:
3. Validation Techniques In the cas
- Page 57 and 58:
Figure 2-4 The process of construct
- Page 59 and 60:
2.3 Results and Discussion 2.3.1 Pr
- Page 61 and 62:
(b) HPLC data (c) e-nose data Figur
- Page 63 and 64:
In the case of FTIR, linear classif
- Page 65 and 66:
2.3.2.2 Class Prediction Accuracies
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 2-7 Class prediction rates o
- Page 69 and 70:
The topology of the three-dimension
- Page 71 and 72:
Figure 2-9 Three-dimensional error
- Page 73 and 74:
Furthermore, a thorough comparison
- Page 75 and 76:
In the master/slave architecture, a
- Page 77 and 78:
precision of the classification acc
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 3-3 The steps of the Nelder-
- Page 81 and 82:
3.3 Results and Discussion 3.3.1 Li
- Page 83 and 84:
3.3.2 Nonlinear Models In order to
- Page 85 and 86:
9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) Figu
- Page 87 and 88:
As an additional visual aid, these
- Page 89 and 90:
a) Number of iterations b) Number o
- Page 91 and 92:
Figure 3-10 Comparison of the execu
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 3-12 Speedup produced by the
- Page 95 and 96:
4 Integration of Heterogeneous Data
- Page 97 and 98:
4.2.2 Procrustes Analysis Procruste
- Page 99 and 100:
symmetric method since the ordering
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 4-3 Steps of CPCA for the da
- Page 103 and 104:
4.2.5 Data Integration and Analysis
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 4-4 Data integration workflo
- Page 107 and 108:
a) GPA b) CPCA Figure 4-6 The conse
- Page 109 and 110:
accuracies as the linear models; po
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 4-8 Classification Results f
- Page 113 and 114:
Similar to FTIR, the PLS-DA ensembl
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 4-9 Class prediction rates o
- Page 117 and 118:
4.3.3 Permutation Tests Even though
- Page 119 and 120:
Even though the interpretation of t
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 4-12 Distribution plots of t
- Page 123 and 124:
RBF SVMs Datasets Original %CC Mean
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 4-14 Boxplots representing t
- Page 127 and 128:
5 Application of the multivariate a
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 5-1 Mean FTIR spectra for ca
- Page 131 and 132:
5.2.2.2 Fourier Transform Infrared
- Page 133 and 134:
5.2.2.4 Data Overview For each expe
- Page 135 and 136:
5.2.3.3 High Throughput Liquid Chro
- Page 137 and 138:
Figure 5-5 displays the PCA scores
- Page 139 and 140:
(a) GPA (b) CPCA Figure 5-6 The con
- Page 141 and 142:
observation confirms that indeed CP
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 5-8 Class prediction rates o
- Page 145 and 146:
(a) RBF SVMs (b) PLS-DA Figure 5-9
- Page 147 and 148:
RBF SVMs Datasets Original %CC Mean
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 5-12 Execution times of the
- Page 151 and 152:
(a) FTIR data (b) Raman data Figure
- Page 153 and 154:
The classification results for the
- Page 155 and 156:
Figure 5-16 Class prediction rates
- Page 157 and 158:
(a) RBF SVMs (b) PLS-DA Figure 5-17
- Page 159 and 160:
RBF SVMs Datasets Original %CC Mean
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 5-20 Execution times of the
- Page 163 and 164:
(a) FTIR data (b) HPLC data 148
- Page 165 and 166:
(a) GPA (b) CPCA Figure 5-22 The co
- Page 167 and 168:
The classification results of the f
- Page 169 and 170:
Figure 5-24 Classification Results
- Page 171 and 172:
Figure 5-25 Class prediction rates
- Page 173 and 174:
The permutation results for the dat
- Page 175 and 176:
Figure 5-28 Distribution plots of t
- Page 177 and 178:
RBF SVMs Datasets Original %CC Mean
- Page 179 and 180:
Figure 5-30 Boxplots representing t
- Page 181 and 182:
5.4 Comparison of the individual ca
- Page 183 and 184:
Figure 5-32 Investigating the commo
- Page 185 and 186:
6 Development of improved visualisa
- Page 187 and 188:
6.2.2 Generating static graphs As d
- Page 189 and 190:
Figure 6-2 Construction process of
- Page 191 and 192:
6.2.2.2 Generating dynamic reports
- Page 193 and 194:
activity, while simultaneously the
- Page 195 and 196:
or disappeared (Wang et al., 2008).
- Page 197 and 198:
ectangles, circles and/or irregular
- Page 199 and 200:
In addition to the static figures g
- Page 201 and 202:
c) graphics package d) ggplot2 pack
- Page 203 and 204:
In addition to aesthetics, faceting
- Page 205 and 206:
Datasets FTIR HPLC e-nose PLS-DA (L
- Page 207 and 208:
Figure 6-10 Interactive dendrogram
- Page 209 and 210:
6.4 Conclusion The work reported in
- Page 211 and 212:
large number of individual models i
- Page 213 and 214:
The generated suite of tools, as pr
- Page 215 and 216:
In addition, the difficulty to corr
- Page 217 and 218:
REFERENCES Almeida, J. A. S., Barbo
- Page 219 and 220:
Processing., Proceedings of the 12t
- Page 221 and 222:
Clarke, B., Fokoué, E. and Zhang,
- Page 223 and 224:
spectroscopy and machine learning",
- Page 225 and 226:
Gower, J. C. (1975), "Generalized p
- Page 227 and 228:
Jardon, M. (2006), Systems Biology:
- Page 229 and 230:
Nicolaou, N., Xu, Y. and Goodacre,
- Page 231 and 232:
Shah, A. A., Barthel, D., Lukasiak,
- Page 233 and 234:
Vera, G., Jansen, R. and Suppi, R.
- Page 235:
Xu, Y. and Goodacre, R. (2012), "Mu