25.12.2013 Views

A GENRE THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON DIGITAL ... - ETD

A GENRE THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON DIGITAL ... - ETD

A GENRE THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON DIGITAL ... - ETD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

activities and structures. Also, I suggest that we attend to multiple historical trajectories that<br />

provide the reproductive basis and resources for the present discursive work. In this direction, an<br />

ongoing digital storytelling involves the unfolding and weaving together of a diversity of homely<br />

as well as sophisticated genres. These “other” cultural practices and meaning potentials residing<br />

in “other” places and times are what extant research fails to account for. When we take these<br />

historically accumulated meaning potential into consideration, we may come to observe each<br />

unique digital storytelling project as partially familiar.<br />

In what follows, I further my interrogation of a celebratory stance by elaborating on these<br />

ideas from a sociohistorical perspective. In doing so, I draw on analytical frames found in genre<br />

theory to explore the production condition of digital storytelling as socio-historically situated,<br />

mediated by cultural tools, horizontally and vertically distributed, and injected with meanings<br />

residing in other times and places. Working from analytical frames that I have come to name as<br />

that of a social historian, I conceive digital storytelling as a loosely defined cultural model that<br />

has acquired historically developed and stabilized discursive, material, and practical structures,<br />

which constantly mediate ongoing discursive work in paradoxical ways. In this vein, what is<br />

achievable by an individual is always considered within the framework of a broad, collective<br />

cultural practice.<br />

In fundamental ways, the social historian’s view diverges from the celebratory stance in<br />

its effort to grapple with contingent, local, and individual discursive acts within the historically<br />

inherited, typified, and collective frameworks, experiences, and structures. In revising the model<br />

of discursive production, a social historian does not take value from the individual and his/her<br />

contingent activities. Rather, a social historian temporarily foregrounds the historical, collective,<br />

and typified to reveal a host of shaded forces, agents, practices, and institutions that work in<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!