26.12.2013 Views

A NULLSTELLENSATZ FOR AMOEBAS

A NULLSTELLENSATZ FOR AMOEBAS

A NULLSTELLENSATZ FOR AMOEBAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENDOSCOPIC LIFTING 453<br />

Definition 1<br />

Let π denote an automorphic representation of G = Sp 4mn . We denote by O G (π)<br />

the set of all unipotent classes of H with the following property. A unipotent class<br />

O ∈ O G (π) if, for all unipotent classes Õ > O, the representation π does not have a<br />

nonzero Fourier coefficient corresponding to Õ. When there is no confusion, we write<br />

O(π) for O G (π).<br />

The main result of Section 2 is the following theorem.<br />

THEOREM 1<br />

We have O( τ ) = ((2m) 2n ).<br />

Proof<br />

To prove this theorem, we need to prove two things. First, we need to prove that given a<br />

unipotent orbit O of Sp 4mn which is greater or not related to ((2m) 2n ), the representation<br />

τ has no nonzero Fourier coefficient that corresponds to O. Then we need to show<br />

that τ has a nonzero Fourier coefficient that corresponds to the unipotent orbit<br />

((2m) 2n ). The first part follows as in [GRS9, Sections 2, 3], but by replacing n with<br />

m and k with n. Indeed, the proof is local. We show that the unramified constituents<br />

of the residue cannot support any functional that is induced from a global Fourier<br />

coefficient corresponding to a unipotent orbit that is bigger than or not related to<br />

((2m) 2n ). It follows from [GRS9, Definition 2.1, Lemma 3.1] that the local unramified<br />

constituents are the same as in our case defined above. By applying [GRS9, Lemma 3.3,<br />

Proposition 3.6], we may deduce that a similar result holds for τ defined here.<br />

Thus we need only prove the second part, namely, that τ has a nonzero Fourier<br />

coefficient that corresponds to the unipotent orbit ((2m) 2n ).Let̂Q denote the standard<br />

parabolic subgroup of Sp 4mn whose Levi part is GL 2n ×···×GL 2n .LetU denote its<br />

unipotent radical. In terms of matrices, we have<br />

⎧⎛<br />

⎞<br />

⎫<br />

I 2n X 1 ∗<br />

I 2n X 2 ∗<br />

. ..<br />

⎪⎨<br />

Xm−1 ∗<br />

U =<br />

I 2n Y<br />

⎪⎬<br />

I 2n Xm−1<br />

∗ : X i ∈ Mat 2n×2n ,Y∈ Mat 0 2n×2n .<br />

.<br />

⎜<br />

.. ⎟<br />

⎝<br />

⎪⎩<br />

I 2n X1<br />

∗ ⎠<br />

⎪⎭<br />

I 2n<br />

On U(F )\U(A), we define a character ψ U as follows. For Y = (Y i,j ),defineψ U (u) =<br />

ψ(tr(X 1 +···+X m−1 ) + tr ′ (Y )), where tr ′ (Y ) = Y 1,1 +···+Y n,n .<br />

For a vector θ τ in the space of τ , consider the Fourier coefficient θ U,ψ U<br />

τ<br />

(g).<br />

Following [G3], it is not hard to check that this Fourier coefficient does indeed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!