Authoritarianism and Undsdevdopmenl

A@w, elD agued thal all voling tules, bc th€ dajonty vorinS or rwo- thidr
najomy or slalu q@, dusr indirably confli€:r sn€ basic dem@raric ftn.
Scn's wort shov€d uder what .ondilioDs Arow's Impossibility of T!@rcm
wuld @Dc ro DB, rr His 6nt ibution tut only dr.ndcd ad tuichcd rn lictd
of S@ial Choicc il also innuen€ed the ma of eonobic m4wnenr ofporedy
.rd ircqu.lrty. S6's @rccln of .caprbitily' is rhc dosr Evotution ry
coalribution kl &vel@n6r €@noni6 and s€ial indica!06, which dg6 lhai
govcmdb should b€ n a$red againrt the @.cEic @pdtiliri.s of lhen
c'1i4s. It is up !o the individu.l si.ry ro nEke lhe ljsr ofoinimM cap.bititis
g@et€ed by ibat sciery. tn his ituisr€nce on dking quesrions of vatue. long
moved rbm s.rios €dohic @6id.ndon, s€tr pos€d a mjor chdl.nge !o rb€
.&nomic nod.l thal porrayed self.inlei.sr s rhe prime notivating falo. of
hhtu rtjvity. r'1 Simil&ly, FErl &gu6 rhrl .da€lop@at mut itutude mor
d.n@Ecy. (MoE) dmocracy bust irclude (noe) Bpet for hwd nghts.
ftce riehs oust includc (hoE) polnicat fFedom of sp€lr dsdizrrion dd
.toie. H@rcr,lhe hl|!m ddts musl d$ incbd. Ms
ed $cial b6ic hwo n€eds rce$aty lo cxe'cise s@h potilical choie'.
'
1.2 The Dependency Theory and Neo-Colonialism
The d.po.lency lh@ry p@vides a ben€r urd.sidding fo. diverg€nce
i
Sa Amdt! s.n, Cr,r4 r dr,4 ,id y.6rc4,r ro\rm. O\tord I fllo,ry phi tou)
:',sc annrta *1, o1 EhB ud E@@ra ro)rord o\ford urtr6i9 pEr t9!7)
- Andr Gu.d.' Ftut flE Untadqdtorcfl of O.Etopnd: Ar Autub,osFphst E3j.y.. op
253