Authoritarianism and Undsdevdopmenl

faidy piinitive foms, sncb s pcMrdisric dictatoBhips dd miliLry jums dd
moG iNtitution lis€d' authod&ie egih6, wilh single pany/@rpoarisi
sysl€m .nd bwalcnlic,1|chnochli€ insfiulioB. Ir dgues thlr a[hontario
tdms of peMn.listic di.rabrshitc ad nilirlry julls t&k instiiuiion l abliry io
ircludc s(49oniv. wial foMs md inpl.ncnr poli€y ed G ooly likely lo b.
viabl. ar lower l.vcls of development. On ih. onlrary, more .inslirurionalisd'
d$onlari& Gdms, wi$ singl. p{iyl@rponrin sysrems ard
b@ucEiidtahrocratic iEriiulio6 @ cotuid€r€d Flatively hoE ,hodeh,'
[wirg tlF Dcsibliiy to be e@ irctEiv. dd dl@! rhe @pa.iry ro pllls
delelopnent goals md rhe.bility !o be duble ar oDid@bly highc, leveh of
dq.lopmot This $h@l $8as1s r!,t rh@ is nc.d b $parre .populisl
authori&rid Egim€s liom buEauqaric authoritnio. iesines, althols} both
cplBdi OE dcvelopoi fom ol althoriI{riais. Fbn Ois point of vi.e, Jaldr
is coNidded s cpre*ntatirc of .bwud.tic au{@.iririeisD sd Chim a m
€wplc of populisl aurhonbri&isD'. A@rdirg to rhis ei.w, populin
sulhoril&im Egincs @ iniriat d duinS.dy-middl. pdiods of dd€lopl@t s
a e$lr of tui.ldlc class Gbcltioro agaiosl old oligefiB tud thcy int€nd io
&livde md irclude la€d s4tim of poputarion in th. Ime of .cdisributiv.
Etdm. o.1h. oth.' ha4 bl@@nric authorirlrid rsiD6 e.bs.riH s a
ph4onhoo of rl| rasition to nN politics in which ertdir''i& pow€r is
ucd by th€ nilitary ding o0 behalf of rlF bourgeohie ed toEig. capilal io
exctud. me mbilising elting clN in rlF nm of epir.t dMuhri@. Som
Micts clain $al populist auihorit rieism h successtut fom of .uihoriarimiu
241