Authoritarianism and Undsdevdopmenl

,iu@['s rcjdion of rhe w6rem @n@ic mod.l ad hi5 .nphasis on th.
@..ept oi€quality of manlind od social juslice on the ocasio! of th€ op€ni.8
c@nony of the Ssre Ba* of Prtblm w6 the rsLr.n.nl of his fsirh in
cE{inB a ftw slale for dE MBlims of Indi! for $.ir @rcnic dd sid
beilm.ni dd his ssue@ for all f.ddaling unils of Prlist n of lhet equal
panj.jFtion in lhc Slacrs rcsows in ecodae with th. p.inciple of eqony,
lib.ny !!d sial justie. tulir, in his imwlral .ddGs to llc Co6tiruor
Asnbly of Pakisiar, Jimah had delarcd, 'lf E lm1 10 mal. thh gre.l slale of
Palbtan happy ad presFros w€ should wholly ed slely conentral€ on rh€
wll b.ing of dE p€ople, ud *peially ofd. nl.s dd lhe poor'. tt
3. Center vs. Provinces- L,n€quel Distribution of Resources
and unequal development
Thc n€c@lonial capilalist md.l p6ucd by the dly poli€y Dnt6 of
Paldst ., posed *nou chrllmSd for .qul dbiribudon of sr.rc'! Etu dd
€sbblhhing @ equal rconomic i.filsttucnrc for wery fed.nliig ui1 of th.
oulry. As eelid di$!se4 th. @ntinution of the @lori.l legacy of .
'Seuiry Si.&' tu rhe @nt€xt of Cold Wd cnforc€d th. onddllim of
auilority inlo tu auia@ of bl@uc@y, any and f.udal clss qhich ws
wo*ing in clo* @llaboBtion wilh |h€ forc.s ofn€kolo.ialish. Iris alio@,
qnich m non-EpE*nadvc dd authoritde in ch@ra, ws itr ortrol of tnc
sialet rcsw6 ad thcir distriburio. rpr.*niing the inr€r.sts of lhe W.st
Paktut n only. fte thG panneF of thjs.lli&c., the bl@rc@y, the my dd
lbe fsdal dN bad lhch bts in Wd Pltiste ud Fnicuhny only in on.
275