29.12.2013 Views

Ensaios Econômicos - Sistema de Bibliotecas da FGV - Fundação ...

Ensaios Econômicos - Sistema de Bibliotecas da FGV - Fundação ...

Ensaios Econômicos - Sistema de Bibliotecas da FGV - Fundação ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 4.2: Welfare Cost of Business-Cycle Fluctuations (1947-2012) –% Consumption<br />

PANEL A ( 12 6= 0)<br />

Welfare Cost<br />

Marginal Welfare Cost<br />

1 5 10 20 1 5 10 20<br />

<br />

0.95 -0.01 -0.03 -0.07 -0.14 -0.01 -0.07 -0.14 -0.27<br />

0.97 -0.01 -0.03 -0.07 -0.14 -0.01 -0.07 -0.14 -0.27<br />

0.99 -0.01 -0.03 -0.07 -0.14 -0.01 -0.07 -0.14 -0.27<br />

PANEL B ( 12 = 0)<br />

Welfare Cost<br />

Marginal Welfare Cost<br />

1 5 10 20 1 5 10 20<br />

<br />

0.95 0.002 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.004 0.02 0.04 0.07<br />

0.97 0.002 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.004 0.02 0.04 0.07<br />

0.99 0.002 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.004 0.02 0.04 0.07<br />

Note: 12 is the covariance between " t (permanent shocks) and t (transitory<br />

shocks) <strong>de</strong>…ned in equation (2.9)<br />

sumption for reasonable discount values and preference parameters ( = 0:985; = 5), US$ 208:98<br />

at 2009 prices. Marginal welfare costs – 0 T<br />

(0) – are about twice the size of total welfare costs<br />

for reasonable discount values and preference parameters ( = 0:985; = 5): 1:32% of per-capita<br />

consumption.<br />

In Table 4.4, panel A, we present total and marginal welfare cost of all macroeconomic uncertainty.<br />

For D , our results are very close to those of the welfare costs of economic growth for<br />

( = 0:985; = 5) – 0:65% of consumption. We …nd the same regarding marginal welfare costs<br />

0 D<br />

(0): they are 1:34% of consumption for i<strong>de</strong>ntical parameter values.<br />

In panel B of Tables 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4, we present results of total and marginal welfare costs<br />

when we impose the constraint that 12 = 0 in estimating the parameters in (2.6). They cover<br />

the post-war period, 1947-2012, and are all based on structural-time-series mo<strong>de</strong>l estimates, which<br />

was discussed in Section 4.3. From the work of Morley, Nelson, and Zivot (2003) on GDP, one<br />

should expect that imposing 12 = 0 yields a much smoother trend than the one found when we<br />

let the <strong>da</strong>ta estimate freely 12 , i.e., the VAR-based approach of Section 4.2. Roughly speaking,<br />

this should reduce the welfare cost of economic-growth variation and increase the welfare costs of<br />

business cycles.<br />

In<strong>de</strong>ed, these are exactly our …ndings. Comparing panels A and B of Table 4.2 for ( = 0:985; = 5),<br />

shows that although the welfare costs of business cycles are negative for VAR-based estimates<br />

( 12 6= 0), reaching 0:03% of consumption, our estimate when 12 = 0 is imposed is 0:01% of<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!