US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA
US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA
US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
epresentative of a local government with jurisdiction over the area in which the effects of<br />
an undertaking may occur is entitled to participate as a consulting party" <strong>and</strong> in 36 CFR<br />
800.3((f)(1), under consultation, it is stated that "the [federal] agency official shall invite<br />
any local governments or applicants that are entitled to be consulting parties under 800.2"<br />
Pima County has jurisdiction over the proposed undertaking APE. Pima County specifically<br />
requested that the <strong>GSA</strong> actively <strong>and</strong> comprehensively include the Pima County Office of<br />
Cultural Resources <strong>and</strong> Historic Preservation (OCRHP) in the planning, review, evaluation of<br />
significance <strong>and</strong> assessment of effects regarding historic properties. This has not been<br />
done. The October 27, 2010, consultation letter from <strong>GSA</strong> to SHPO regarding these very<br />
topics does not include Pima County as a copied recipient. This deficiency must be<br />
remedied through the inclusion of Pima County OCRHP as a full <strong>and</strong> active participant in<br />
the consultation process as provided for under 36 CFR 800. I also note that the<br />
International Sonoran Desert Alliance is not copied on this correspondence, another<br />
deficiency in the consultation process.<br />
Chapter 4.6 Air Quality<br />
The preferred alternative ignores the effects on air quality caused by an 80-mile round trip<br />
commute from <strong>Ajo</strong> to Lukeville by automobile on air quality. The effects on air quality<br />
may be minimal or lower compared to longer distance commutes from Tucson, Casa<br />
Gr<strong>and</strong>e, <strong>and</strong> Phoenix, however no analysis has been provided.<br />
Chapter 4.8 Visual Resources<br />
The preferred alternative does not adequately address our previous comments requesting<br />
that the architectural building design be compatible with, <strong>and</strong> enhance the appearance of<br />
the adjacent historical district. The designs are generic, mass-produced structures without<br />
any attempt to provide enhancements or design features endemic to the culture <strong>and</strong><br />
history of the local area.<br />
The October 27, 2010 letter from Jane Lehman, <strong>GSA</strong> Regional Historic Preservation<br />
Officer to Robert Frankenberger, Arizona Office of Historic Preservation, Arizona State<br />
Parks (included in the Appendix), identifies the nearby <strong>Ajo</strong> Townsite Historic District as<br />
inspired by the City Beautiful movement. This is an important movement in the history of<br />
the Planning profession dating from the turn of the last century. The premise of the<br />
movement is that urban design is a strong influence on the health <strong>and</strong> well-being of the<br />
residents of a community. The Draft EA de-emphasizes the importance of the Historic<br />
District to the community <strong>and</strong> ignores the effects of this project on local urban design.<br />
The architectural <strong>and</strong> site designs should be revised to be more sensitive to the local area<br />
<strong>and</strong> to the <strong>Ajo</strong> Vision Plan referenced in my May 10, 2010 letter to Michael Dawson, with<br />
EcoPlan Associates (included in the EA Appendix). The final product should seek to<br />
enhance <strong>and</strong> add improvements to the community.<br />
Chapter 4.9 Water Resources<br />
Water quality issues have been ignored. Stating that an evaluation will need to be done to<br />
determine if the project is 404 compliant is not sufficient. If the project is found to be 404<br />
compliant, additional requirements will be triggered. Determination of 404 compliance<br />
5