03.01.2014 Views

US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA

US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA

US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

epresentative of a local government with jurisdiction over the area in which the effects of<br />

an undertaking may occur is entitled to participate as a consulting party" <strong>and</strong> in 36 CFR<br />

800.3((f)(1), under consultation, it is stated that "the [federal] agency official shall invite<br />

any local governments or applicants that are entitled to be consulting parties under 800.2"<br />

Pima County has jurisdiction over the proposed undertaking APE. Pima County specifically<br />

requested that the <strong>GSA</strong> actively <strong>and</strong> comprehensively include the Pima County Office of<br />

Cultural Resources <strong>and</strong> Historic Preservation (OCRHP) in the planning, review, evaluation of<br />

significance <strong>and</strong> assessment of effects regarding historic properties. This has not been<br />

done. The October 27, 2010, consultation letter from <strong>GSA</strong> to SHPO regarding these very<br />

topics does not include Pima County as a copied recipient. This deficiency must be<br />

remedied through the inclusion of Pima County OCRHP as a full <strong>and</strong> active participant in<br />

the consultation process as provided for under 36 CFR 800. I also note that the<br />

International Sonoran Desert Alliance is not copied on this correspondence, another<br />

deficiency in the consultation process.<br />

Chapter 4.6 Air Quality<br />

The preferred alternative ignores the effects on air quality caused by an 80-mile round trip<br />

commute from <strong>Ajo</strong> to Lukeville by automobile on air quality. The effects on air quality<br />

may be minimal or lower compared to longer distance commutes from Tucson, Casa<br />

Gr<strong>and</strong>e, <strong>and</strong> Phoenix, however no analysis has been provided.<br />

Chapter 4.8 Visual Resources<br />

The preferred alternative does not adequately address our previous comments requesting<br />

that the architectural building design be compatible with, <strong>and</strong> enhance the appearance of<br />

the adjacent historical district. The designs are generic, mass-produced structures without<br />

any attempt to provide enhancements or design features endemic to the culture <strong>and</strong><br />

history of the local area.<br />

The October 27, 2010 letter from Jane Lehman, <strong>GSA</strong> Regional Historic Preservation<br />

Officer to Robert Frankenberger, Arizona Office of Historic Preservation, Arizona State<br />

Parks (included in the Appendix), identifies the nearby <strong>Ajo</strong> Townsite Historic District as<br />

inspired by the City Beautiful movement. This is an important movement in the history of<br />

the Planning profession dating from the turn of the last century. The premise of the<br />

movement is that urban design is a strong influence on the health <strong>and</strong> well-being of the<br />

residents of a community. The Draft EA de-emphasizes the importance of the Historic<br />

District to the community <strong>and</strong> ignores the effects of this project on local urban design.<br />

The architectural <strong>and</strong> site designs should be revised to be more sensitive to the local area<br />

<strong>and</strong> to the <strong>Ajo</strong> Vision Plan referenced in my May 10, 2010 letter to Michael Dawson, with<br />

EcoPlan Associates (included in the EA Appendix). The final product should seek to<br />

enhance <strong>and</strong> add improvements to the community.<br />

Chapter 4.9 Water Resources<br />

Water quality issues have been ignored. Stating that an evaluation will need to be done to<br />

determine if the project is 404 compliant is not sufficient. If the project is found to be 404<br />

compliant, additional requirements will be triggered. Determination of 404 compliance<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!