US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7.3 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures would be implemented to ensure that the Preferred Alternative would have no significant impact on the quality of the human environment. • Removal of mature native tree and cactus species will be subject to the Arizona Native Plant Law administered by the AZDA and the Pima County Protected Plant Ordinance. Native plant removal will be minimized to the extent practicable. The construction contractor shall be required to contact the AZDA at least 60 calendar days prior to construction to arrange for proper native plant treatment. • The contractor shall employ a qualified biologist to complete preconstruction surveys for Sonoran Desert tortoises and conduct a Sonoran Desert tortoise awareness program. Preconstruction surveys for Sonoran Desert tortoises shall be conducted within 48 hours prior to construction in areas that will be disturbed. • If any Sonoran Desert tortoises are encountered during construction, the contractor shall adhere to the AGFD “Guidelines for Handling Sonoran Desert Tortoises Encountered on Development Projects” revised October 23, 2007. • The contractor shall comply with Pima County Air Quality Control ordinances and shall complete an Air Quality Activity Permit. • The GSA project manager will arrange for a formal assessment of the potential jurisdictional limits of the two washes on the Preferred Alternative site prior to construction activities if construction activities are proposed to encroach on or impact the washes. Should a CleanWater Act Section 401/404 permit be required, the GSA will obtain the permit prior to any construction in the washes. • The contractor shall not disturb any of the drainages surrounding the project area until a determination has been made by the Corps that the project may proceed under a Nationwide Permit and an Individual Water Quality Certification from the ADEQ has been obtained. • The contractor shall complete an AZPDES Construction General Permit, including a Notice of Intent and a Notice of Termination. In accordance with the AZPDES requirements, a SWPPP shall be developed and implemented for the project. The SWPPP will specify control measures to reduce soil erosion while containing and minimizing the release of construction pollutants. • Because the Preferred Alternative will require demolition of existing structures, the GSA will engage an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act–certified inspector to inspect all structures to be demolished. If RACM is present in the structure, the GSA shall develop a work plan to remove, transport, and dispose of these materials. • At least 10 days prior to demolition of any structure, the GSA will provide the ADEQ NESHAP coordinator with a NESHAP notification form for each structure to be demolished. Environmental Assessment 49 Ajo Housing Development Project
Chapter 8 Project Preparers and Contributors General Services Administration Greg Smith Regional Environmental Quality Advisor Osmahn Kadri NEPA Project Manager Gene Gibson Regional Public Affairs Officer Jane Lehman Regional Historic Preservation Officer Customs and Border Protection Robin Coachman Project Manager EcoPlan Associates, Inc. Michael R. Dawson Senior Environmental Planner Steven Reuter Environmental Planner F. Bruce Brown Principal Thomas C. Ashbeck Director, Biological Resources Group Stephen Hale Senior Project Scientist Tricia Balluff Environmental Planner Leslie J. Stafford Director, Environmental Planning Group Environmental Assessment 50 Ajo Housing Development Project
Page 1 and 2:
Final Environmental Assessment for
Page 3 and 4: Chapter 7 Conclusion...............
Page 5 and 6: SR 85 State Route 85 SWPPP Storm Wa
Page 7 and 8: ^ Du "10 nt W'1IJtIl o G !lUll I ON
Page 9 and 10: The need to staff the POE for 24-ho
Page 11 and 12: The CBP Housing Program Feasibility
Page 13 and 14: Lukeville, Why, and Ajo areas. Thre
Page 15 and 16: 3.1.3 Lukeville Alternative 3 Lukev
Page 17 and 18: Perro De Nieve S. Sahuaro St. Monte
Page 19 and 20: 3.2.2 No Action Alternative Under t
Page 21 and 22: environmental justice concerns. Dat
Page 23 and 24: The median household income of Ajo
Page 25 and 26: Gila woodpeckers, ravens, roadrunne
Page 27 and 28: Species Habitat Potential Occurrenc
Page 29 and 30: Section 106 of the NHPA requires fe
Page 31 and 32: Federally funded projects are subje
Page 33 and 34: ecognizes that major modifications
Page 35 and 36: No Action Alternative The No Action
Page 37 and 38: Chapter 5 Cumulative Impacts Cumula
Page 39 and 40: Arizona Game and Fish Department Th
Page 41 and 42: GSA response: Discussed in Chapter
Page 43 and 44: Approximately 60 people attended th
Page 45 and 46: Comment 7. Involve local developers
Page 47 and 48: Comment 16. What is the cumulative
Page 49 and 50: Comment 31. Notes apparent contradi
Page 51 and 52: Comment 45. There is a clear misund
Page 53: Chapter 7 Conclusion 7.1 Summary of
Page 57 and 58: Parkhurst, Janet H. 2001. Ajo: A Mo
Page 59 and 60: Appendix A USFWS Threatened, Endang
Page 61 and 62: Appendix A. USFWS threatened, endan
Page 63 and 64: Appendix B Scoping Letter and Maili
Page 65 and 66: On General Services Administration
Page 67 and 68: Project Vicinity U.S. Customs and B
Page 69 and 70: .' GSA Pacific Rim Region October
Page 71: cc: Kirsten Brinker-Kulis Advisory
Page 75 and 76: Arizona's On-line Environmental Rev
Page 77 and 78: Arizona's On~line Environmental Rev
Page 83 and 84: GUIDELINES FOR HANDLING SONORAN DES
Page 85 and 86: Mr, Mr. Michael ODawson .....son Ae
Page 87 and 88: G_a' US Mr. Michael Oewson Dawson R
Page 89 and 90: U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION NO
Page 91 and 92: 111'1 EcoPlan Associates, Inc. .. C
Page 93 and 94: Dear Representative Grijalva: Thank
Page 95 and 96: Page ;? Mr. Robert Frankeberger UC1
Page 97 and 98: U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATIO
Page 99 and 100: Appendix E Public Scoping Meeting a
Page 101 and 102: GSA CBP Ajo Housing Development Pro
Page 103 and 104: Pacific Rim Region Public Hearing A
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix F Public Comments
Page 107 and 108:
Page two of two Jim and Linda Sharp
Page 109 and 110:
file:///W|/07-033%20GSA/Task%20013-
Page 111 and 112:
~ue1t~~~ e ....:.;·•••••
Page 113 and 114:
, ... , i I I I I I ,. I Mar 24 10
Page 115 and 116:
(} 5A ;0 t1{lLlf!l6L R. ))/tWSOIJ ;
Page 117 and 118:
A..t~ II·Pacific Rim Region Public
Page 119 and 120:
Page 10f2 Mike Dawson From: Sent: T
Page 121 and 122:
·. From: osmahn.kadri@gsa.gov [mai
Page 123 and 124:
---------- Forwarded message ------
Page 125 and 126:
Page 1 of 1 Mike Dawson From: osmah
Page 127 and 128:
Page lof? Mike Dawson From: Sent: T
Page 129 and 130:
Page 30f7 human nutritive value, or
Page 131 and 132:
Page 5 of? Survey stated that the A
Page 133 and 134:
Page 7 of7 the property which can p
Page 135 and 136:
oPP011unity there is to tighten not
Page 137 and 138:
INTERNATIONAL SONORAN DESERT ALLIAN
Page 139 and 140:
Mr. Osmahn Kadri Re: U.S. General S
Page 141 and 142:
The Draft EA does not contain any c
Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 4.5 Cultural Resources Ther
Page 145 and 146:
should be done at the EA stage so t
show all

US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?