US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

e" " inventoried U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION AJO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT May 19,2010 Page 3 of 3 activities. This is best concluded ooncluded prior to, rna making 'n9 any decision iregarding p~oposed proposed Pl'(ljeot project impact .pact un.der under NEPA. 6. A portion of althe subject property is within.the'second hislo' historically 'calli)! platledaddition platted addition to the historic Ajo Towns't'e, Townsite, and' the remainder of the property is adjacent to both the first and a.nd :second historically platted additions to~he the historic Ajo Townsite. The GSA will needla to ,e,valuate evaluate 1the NRHP el'gibi eligibility i.y of these two Aj:o Ajo Townsite ad'ditions additions BiRd and BS$ess~he assess the effect of the proposed project on these additions snoud should they be el'gibl'e. eligible. Thjs This is best concluded prior P:OF to making .any decision regarding proposed project Impact impact under NEPA. EIPA. I 7. 7 , Our . . records recor~s . '1,1. show that . the. subject s ~ ub'ect .. ~ . ·prop '.property . ...... l;Jt,y ,y· . has_not .ot . been en in. .ven,,,,ne :M" d I·, for ,or hi': historic s,onc *' .'. props. properties. . " rt·les. ,.Th" This IS inventory and identification id'en.tifica~'o'n of his,to historic properties" properties, evaluation ation of si9nificance~ significance, and assessment of 'effeas.; effects, mU8 must beconducted'per 36 CFR800'. 800. This is, best ,concl'uded concluded prior to making ,any decision regarding the plloposed proposed project impact under und. rEPA. NEPA. 8. We expect that ha,t t' the GSA wi! will initiate itiate and oonducf~ conclud~ consultation c~nisultation wit!h with the (he Stale State IHlist,oric Historic Preserva[on Preservation Office as part of ;its compliance requirements prior to making any decision rega'rdig regarding the proposedl project impact uinder under NEPA. .EPA. 9. Given the'm,porla importance of~, the NRHP listed Ajo Townsite to Pima County, the investment oft the people' 'of PimaCo'lWlnty County in the NRHP listed Ajo Townsite through (he the voter approval and expenditure .xpendRure of'County bond funds, and the Countts County's infere'st interest in the pllotectio:n protection of historic properties,. the ,e County's Office of Cultural tral Resources 'rees and Historic Preservation (OCRHP) requests t1equests that GSA actively and comprehensively .henslve'ly include nelude OCRHP in the pia planning, ,Ining, review, e~aluation evaluation of' signifi'cance,and significance, and assessment of' effects· regarding historic properties within, adjacent to; to, and a dindfose close proximity to the sUbject'parce subject-parcel as required under :NHPA. and' NEPA. Thank you _'or{heopportunityto for the opportunity to comment. Sincerey Sincerely, Sherry rryAPI. R ther Manager ,nvironme nvironmental ts and Long longl Ra'ge Range Planning Group Pima bounty County Development ,opmen Services cc: CC: C., H. Huckleberry, 00 County Administrator .min~strator Diana Durazo, Ouraz-O, Special Staff Assistant to, the County Administrator
111'1 EcoPlan Associates, Inc. .. Cn~;roHm~ntQ/Sdma «fl."""'''' £amopn~ Record of Conversation Date: June 09, 2010 Time: 10:45 a.m. Federal Number: ADOT Number: Project Name: 07-033013 GSA Ajo Housing Development Project Contact Initiator: Steven Reuter of EcoPlan Contact Recipient: Erin Fernandez of USFWS Copy: Regarding: USFWS comments on GSA Ajo Housing Conversation Summary Ms. Fernandez of USFW requested on behalf of USFW that no non-native or invasive species be utilized in landscaping for the project. USFWS had no additional comments. Action Items • No non-native or invasive species be used in landscaping 701 West Southern Avenue, Suite 203 • Mesa, Arizona 85210 • (480) 733-6666 • Fax (480) 733-6661
Page 1 and 2:
Final Environmental Assessment for
Page 3 and 4:
Chapter 7 Conclusion...............
Page 5 and 6:
SR 85 State Route 85 SWPPP Storm Wa
Page 7 and 8:
^ Du "10 nt W'1IJtIl o G !lUll I ON
Page 9 and 10:
The need to staff the POE for 24-ho
Page 11 and 12:
The CBP Housing Program Feasibility
Page 13 and 14:
Lukeville, Why, and Ajo areas. Thre
Page 15 and 16:
3.1.3 Lukeville Alternative 3 Lukev
Page 17 and 18:
Perro De Nieve S. Sahuaro St. Monte
Page 19 and 20:
3.2.2 No Action Alternative Under t
Page 21 and 22:
environmental justice concerns. Dat
Page 23 and 24:
The median household income of Ajo
Page 25 and 26:
Gila woodpeckers, ravens, roadrunne
Page 27 and 28:
Species Habitat Potential Occurrenc
Page 29 and 30:
Section 106 of the NHPA requires fe
Page 31 and 32:
Federally funded projects are subje
Page 33 and 34:
ecognizes that major modifications
Page 35 and 36:
No Action Alternative The No Action
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 5 Cumulative Impacts Cumula
Page 39 and 40: Arizona Game and Fish Department Th
Page 41 and 42: GSA response: Discussed in Chapter
Page 43 and 44: Approximately 60 people attended th
Page 45 and 46: Comment 7. Involve local developers
Page 47 and 48: Comment 16. What is the cumulative
Page 49 and 50: Comment 31. Notes apparent contradi
Page 51 and 52: Comment 45. There is a clear misund
Page 53 and 54: Chapter 7 Conclusion 7.1 Summary of
Page 55 and 56: Chapter 8 Project Preparers and Con
Page 57 and 58: Parkhurst, Janet H. 2001. Ajo: A Mo
Page 59 and 60: Appendix A USFWS Threatened, Endang
Page 61 and 62: Appendix A. USFWS threatened, endan
Page 63 and 64: Appendix B Scoping Letter and Maili
Page 65 and 66: On General Services Administration
Page 67 and 68: Project Vicinity U.S. Customs and B
Page 69 and 70: .' GSA Pacific Rim Region October
Page 71: cc: Kirsten Brinker-Kulis Advisory
Page 75 and 76: Arizona's On-line Environmental Rev
Page 77 and 78: Arizona's On~line Environmental Rev
Page 83 and 84: GUIDELINES FOR HANDLING SONORAN DES
Page 85 and 86: Mr, Mr. Michael ODawson .....son Ae
Page 87 and 88: G_a' US Mr. Michael Oewson Dawson R
Page 89: U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION NO
Page 93 and 94: Dear Representative Grijalva: Thank
Page 95 and 96: Page ;? Mr. Robert Frankeberger UC1
Page 97 and 98: U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATIO
Page 99 and 100: Appendix E Public Scoping Meeting a
Page 101 and 102: GSA CBP Ajo Housing Development Pro
Page 103 and 104: Pacific Rim Region Public Hearing A
Page 105 and 106: Appendix F Public Comments
Page 107 and 108: Page two of two Jim and Linda Sharp
Page 109 and 110: file:///W|/07-033%20GSA/Task%20013-
Page 111 and 112: ~ue1t~~~ e ....:.;·•••••
Page 113 and 114: , ... , i I I I I I ,. I Mar 24 10
Page 115 and 116: (} 5A ;0 t1{lLlf!l6L R. ))/tWSOIJ ;
Page 117 and 118: A..t~ II·Pacific Rim Region Public
Page 119 and 120: Page 10f2 Mike Dawson From: Sent: T
Page 121 and 122: ·. From: osmahn.kadri@gsa.gov [mai
Page 123 and 124: ---------- Forwarded message ------
Page 125 and 126: Page 1 of 1 Mike Dawson From: osmah
Page 127 and 128: Page lof? Mike Dawson From: Sent: T
Page 129 and 130: Page 30f7 human nutritive value, or
Page 131 and 132: Page 5 of? Survey stated that the A
Page 133 and 134: Page 7 of7 the property which can p
Page 135 and 136: oPP011unity there is to tighten not
Page 137 and 138: INTERNATIONAL SONORAN DESERT ALLIAN
Page 139 and 140: Mr. Osmahn Kadri Re: U.S. General S
Page 141 and 142:
The Draft EA does not contain any c
Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 4.5 Cultural Resources Ther
Page 145 and 146:
should be done at the EA stage so t
show all

US Customs and Border Protection Ajo Housing Development ... - GSA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?