08.01.2014 Views

Office of the Health Services Commissioner Annual Report 2008

Office of the Health Services Commissioner Annual Report 2008

Office of the Health Services Commissioner Annual Report 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

How were <strong>the</strong> complaints resolved?<br />

The complaints closed in enquiry are those<br />

that were not confirmed in writing. The<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se may be that <strong>the</strong> caller<br />

felt it was sufficient to tell someone why<br />

<strong>the</strong>y were unhappy and to be heard, however<br />

<strong>the</strong>y may also remain unresolved and <strong>the</strong><br />

person may decide to proceed with <strong>the</strong><br />

complaint at some time in <strong>the</strong> future. There<br />

is a one year time limit on complaints but<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> has <strong>the</strong> discretionary<br />

power to extend this.<br />

The confirmed cases are resolved ei<strong>the</strong>r in<br />

<strong>the</strong> initial assessment process or <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

referred to conciliation. A very small<br />

number are referred for investigation but<br />

this only happens when mediation and<br />

conciliation or referrals to registration<br />

boards are not feasible options. This year<br />

approximately 81% <strong>of</strong> confirmed cases<br />

were resolved in assessment.<br />

The stages at which complaints were<br />

resolved can be seen in Table 6.<br />

Seriousness<br />

All new complaints are given a<br />

“seriousness” rating which depends upon<br />

<strong>the</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcome for <strong>the</strong><br />

consumer and <strong>the</strong> perceived level <strong>of</strong> risk <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> incident. This rating is allocated initially<br />

Stage <strong>of</strong> Complaint Process HRA HSCR Total %<br />

Closed in Assessment 64 852 916 81%<br />

Closed in Conciliation 15 205 220 19%<br />

Closed in Investigation 0 2 2 0%<br />

Total Cases Closed 79 1059 1138 100%<br />

Table 6<br />

Resolution Stages<br />

HRA HSCR Total %<br />

0-3 Months 53 489 902 79%<br />

3-6 Months 10 45 55 5%<br />

3-6 Months 7 42 49 4%<br />

9-12 Months 3 36 39 3%<br />

12-18 Months 5 47 52 5%<br />

18-24 Months 1 20 21 2%<br />

24 Over 0 20 20 2%<br />

Total Cases Closed 79 1059 1138 100%<br />

The data in Table 6.1 illustrates <strong>the</strong> time<br />

taken to resolve and close confirmed cases.<br />

The first three months is, generally, spent<br />

in <strong>the</strong> assessment stage where<br />

approximately 80% <strong>of</strong> cases are resolved<br />

and closed. Legislated timelines require<br />

assessment to be completed within three<br />

months.<br />

on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complaint information<br />

and may be revised and changed during <strong>the</strong><br />

course <strong>of</strong> complaint management as new<br />

information emerges.<br />

Table 6 .1<br />

Time till Resolution<br />

The next stage is usually conciliation (or,<br />

infrequently, investigation). For <strong>the</strong> cases<br />

not closed in assessment 60% were<br />

completed within twelve months, 30% in two<br />

years and <strong>the</strong> remainder in more than two<br />

years. This is <strong>of</strong>ten due to <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> issues and <strong>the</strong> multiple complicated<br />

activities required to reach completion.<br />

Seriousness Rating<br />

1. Low: A phone call, letter or an<br />

explanation should easily resolve <strong>the</strong><br />

problem. Included in this rating are<br />

complaints that are frivolous, vexatious,<br />

obviously misconceived or where an<br />

investigation is unwarranted.<br />

2. Medium: Frequently <strong>the</strong>re has been a<br />

misunderstanding; issues involving access<br />

to records, disputes about costs,<br />

discourtesy, diagnostic or treatment errors<br />

or differences <strong>of</strong> opinion without serious<br />

consequences.<br />

3. High: There may be quality assurance<br />

implications, where changes in practice are<br />

needed to avoid a recurrence or <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

need for policy development. These also<br />

include complaints associated with<br />

allegations <strong>of</strong> negligence leading to<br />

personal injury, pr<strong>of</strong>essional misconduct,<br />

unlawful or unethical acts, lack <strong>of</strong> informed<br />

consent with serious adverse outcomes.<br />

The seriousness rating <strong>of</strong> accepted cases<br />

closed in <strong>the</strong> past year is seen in Table 7.<br />

2007 - <strong>2008</strong><br />

HRA Low Medium High Total %<br />

Access & Correction 22 15 0 37 4%<br />

Collection 2 1 1 4 0%<br />

Data Quality 1 3 0 4 0%<br />

Identifiers 0 1 0 1 0%<br />

Info Available to ano<strong>the</strong>r HSP 6 1 0 7 1%<br />

Transfer/Closure <strong>of</strong> HSP 1 0 0 1 0%<br />

Use & Disclosure 7 15 1 23 2%<br />

None 1 1 0 2 0%<br />

Total 40 37 2 79 7%<br />

HSCR Low Medium High Total %<br />

Access 55 34 10 99 9%<br />

Administration 43 13 2 58 5%<br />

Communication 75 55 6 136 12%<br />

Cost 58 26 2 86 8%<br />

Not Specified 3 5 0 8 0%<br />

Rights 42 21 7 70 6%<br />

Treatment 178 328 96 602 53%<br />

Total 454 482 123 1059 93%<br />

Grand Total 494 519 125 1138 100%<br />

43% 46% 11% 100%<br />

Table 7<br />

Seriousness by Issue at Closure<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> complaints received (89%)<br />

are rated as “low” or “medium” seriousness<br />

and this is consistent from year to year. The<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se complaints can be resolved<br />

by fur<strong>the</strong>r explanation by <strong>the</strong> health service<br />

for <strong>the</strong> complainant.<br />

16<br />

<strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> | <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2008</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!