13.01.2014 Views

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Methodology<br />

This <strong>report</strong> is based on interviews and research conducted from February 2012 to April<br />

2013. In all, <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> conducted 191 interviews with individuals charged with<br />

illegal entry or reentry, <strong>the</strong>ir families, unauthorized migrants who have repeatedly entered<br />

<strong>the</strong> United States, criminal defense attorneys, immigration attorneys, prosecutors, judges,<br />

and representatives of humanitarian and advocacy organizations. We interviewed 55<br />

people convicted of illegal entry or reentry, and interviewed family members or lawyers in<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r 18 cases—for a total of 73 separate case accounts. We examined publicly available<br />

court records in 62 cases, including some cases for which we also had interviews and<br />

some for which we did not. Finally, we corresponded with 35 individuals (including two<br />

whose family members we interviewed) serving sentences in federal prison for illegal entry<br />

or reentry, who consented to participate in our research.<br />

The cases were identified in a variety of ways. In some cases, criminal defense or immigration<br />

attorneys and local advocates referred us to individuals and families. In o<strong>the</strong>r cases,<br />

interviews with migrants in Nogales, Tijuana, and Rosarito, Mexico led us to individuals who<br />

had been charged with illegal entry or reentry. We also identified defendants and attorneys<br />

through searches of news or legal databases, or communicated with <strong>the</strong> attorney or family<br />

directly after observing a court proceeding. Most of <strong>the</strong> individuals who corresponded with us,<br />

and some of <strong>the</strong> defendants and family members we interviewed, contacted <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong><br />

<strong>Watch</strong> directly after hearing from o<strong>the</strong>r inmates about our research.<br />

Our cases do not constitute a random sample, but <strong>the</strong>y include non-citizens both with and<br />

without strong ties to US families and with a variety of prior criminal records.<br />

The cases documented in this <strong>report</strong> are largely from <strong>the</strong> federal court jurisdictions (federal<br />

districts) with <strong>the</strong> most illegal entry and reentry prosecutions—Arizona, New Mexico, <strong>the</strong><br />

Western and Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Districts of Texas, and <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn and Central Districts of<br />

California. <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> conducted interviews with some defendants while <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were in detention awaiting sentencing or serving <strong>the</strong>ir sentences in Los Angeles, California;<br />

Raymondville, Marfa, Pecos, and El Paso, Texas; and Florence, Arizona. We conducted<br />

interviews with individuals who had been deported in Nogales, Tijuana, and Rosarito,<br />

Mexico, and with family members affected by <strong>the</strong>se prosecutions in Arizona, California,<br />

9 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | MAY 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!