Download the full report - Human Rights Watch
Download the full report - Human Rights Watch
Download the full report - Human Rights Watch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
experience, “One or two out of ten will be English-speaking. There are defendants who<br />
don’t speak Spanish, who grew up in <strong>the</strong> US.” 132<br />
Defendants who grew up in <strong>the</strong> US from a young age, whose entire families are in <strong>the</strong> US,<br />
and who have no ties to <strong>the</strong> countries of <strong>the</strong>ir birth are so common, <strong>the</strong> US Sentencing<br />
Commission in 2010 amended <strong>the</strong> sentencing guideline to recognize “cultural<br />
assimilation” as a valid reason for granting a lower-than-guideline sentence, to be<br />
considered in cases where, in part, “those cultural ties provided <strong>the</strong> primary motivation for<br />
<strong>the</strong> defendant’s illegal reentry or continued presence in <strong>the</strong> United States.” 133<br />
Nearly every defense attorney interviewed, however, stated <strong>the</strong>y had rarely seen judges<br />
cite this provision in granting lower sentences. Because <strong>the</strong>re are many defendants in this<br />
situation, reducing sentences every time someone has strong family ties arguably would<br />
defeat <strong>the</strong> purpose of <strong>the</strong> guideline, which aims to set <strong>the</strong> sentence for <strong>the</strong> majority of<br />
defendants. For example, in ruling on a case in which <strong>the</strong> defendant had grown up in El<br />
Paso since <strong>the</strong> age of 10 and had parents, siblings, and children in <strong>the</strong> US, <strong>the</strong> judge<br />
noted, “Unfortunately, <strong>the</strong> Court sees a number of illegal aliens who come into <strong>the</strong> United<br />
States around age 10, and <strong>the</strong> Court has trouble distinguishing [<strong>the</strong> defendant] from <strong>the</strong><br />
many o<strong>the</strong>rs before <strong>the</strong> Court.” 134 Angela Viramontes, an assistant federal defender in<br />
Riverside, California, said she had heard a judge tell her colleague, “If I apply it in this<br />
case, I’d have to apply it to all cases.” 135 Defense attorneys also noted that “cultural<br />
assimilation can be a double-edged sword,” 136 as judges sometimes see <strong>the</strong>se very ties as<br />
evidence that <strong>the</strong> defendant is likely to come back and should be more harshly sentenced<br />
in order to provide a stronger deterrent.<br />
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> acknowledges that many illegal reentry defendants with strong family<br />
ties have prior criminal convictions in <strong>the</strong> United States, and human rights law recognizes<br />
that <strong>the</strong> privilege of living in any country as a non-citizen may be conditional upon obeying<br />
132 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with Magistrate Judge Philip Mesa, El Paso, Texas, September 26, 2012.<br />
133 US Sentencing Guideline 2L1.2, Unlaw<strong>full</strong>y Entering or Remaining in <strong>the</strong> United States (2012).<br />
134 United States v. Santibanez-Salais, 2011 US Dist. LEXIS 21199 *12 (D. N.M. 2011).<br />
135 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with Angela Viramontes, assistant federal defender, Los Angeles, California, October 29, 2012.<br />
136 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> telephone interview with Milagros Cisneros, assistant federal defender in Phoenix, Arizona,<br />
September 10, 2012; <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interviews with Susan Anderson, April 2, 2013; and with Davina Chen, assistant<br />
federal defender, Los Angeles, California, September 6, 2012.<br />
51 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | MAY 2013