Download the full report - Human Rights Watch
Download the full report - Human Rights Watch
Download the full report - Human Rights Watch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The rising number of prosecutions of people with minor criminal histories is in part <strong>the</strong><br />
product of a self-perpetuating cycle: once convicted of illegal entry, an immigrant who<br />
attempts to reenter <strong>the</strong> US is more likely to be prosecuted for illegal reentry because he or<br />
she now has a criminal record. Prior convictions for illegal entry offenses alone could be<br />
sufficient to put a defendant in criminal history categories I, II, or III. Although we do not<br />
have access to <strong>the</strong> criminal records of <strong>the</strong>se defendants, our documentation of specific<br />
cases (as discussed in greater detail in <strong>the</strong> next section) indicates that, in many cases, <strong>the</strong><br />
prior convictions are illegal entry and reentry convictions.<br />
Average sentences for illegal entry offenses have also decreased significantly over <strong>the</strong> past<br />
10 years. In 2002, <strong>the</strong> mean sentence for illegal entry offenses was 30 months, and <strong>the</strong><br />
median sentence was 24 months. 50 In 2012, <strong>the</strong> mean sentence was 19 months, and <strong>the</strong><br />
median sentence was 13 months. 51 This is in large part due to <strong>the</strong> use of “Fast-Track” plea<br />
offers by <strong>the</strong> US government, in which defendants receive automatic reductions in<br />
calculations of offense level in exchange for waiving certain rights and agreeing to faster<br />
conclusion of <strong>the</strong>ir cases. 52 But if <strong>the</strong>se Fast-Track plea offers result in sentences <strong>the</strong><br />
government considers appropriate punishment, <strong>the</strong> decrease in sentences may also<br />
indicate <strong>the</strong> US government views <strong>the</strong>se defendants as less dangerous.<br />
50 US Sentencing Commission, 2002 Annual Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics, “Table 50: Mean and Median<br />
Sentences of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines by Departure Status,”<br />
http://www.ussc.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Annual_Reports_and_Sourcebooks/2002/Table50.pdf (accessed April 25, 2013).<br />
51 Ibid.<br />
52 US Sentencing Commission, “Report on <strong>the</strong> Continuing Impact of US v. Booker on Federal Sentencing,” Part C: Immigration<br />
Offenses, 2012,<br />
http://www.ussc.gov/Legislative_and_Public_Affairs/Congressional_Testimony_and_Reports/Booker_Reports/2012_Booker<br />
/Part_C8_Immigration_Offenses.pdf (accessed April 25, 2013), p. 118.<br />
31 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | MAY 2013