13.01.2014 Views

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The rising number of prosecutions of people with minor criminal histories is in part <strong>the</strong><br />

product of a self-perpetuating cycle: once convicted of illegal entry, an immigrant who<br />

attempts to reenter <strong>the</strong> US is more likely to be prosecuted for illegal reentry because he or<br />

she now has a criminal record. Prior convictions for illegal entry offenses alone could be<br />

sufficient to put a defendant in criminal history categories I, II, or III. Although we do not<br />

have access to <strong>the</strong> criminal records of <strong>the</strong>se defendants, our documentation of specific<br />

cases (as discussed in greater detail in <strong>the</strong> next section) indicates that, in many cases, <strong>the</strong><br />

prior convictions are illegal entry and reentry convictions.<br />

Average sentences for illegal entry offenses have also decreased significantly over <strong>the</strong> past<br />

10 years. In 2002, <strong>the</strong> mean sentence for illegal entry offenses was 30 months, and <strong>the</strong><br />

median sentence was 24 months. 50 In 2012, <strong>the</strong> mean sentence was 19 months, and <strong>the</strong><br />

median sentence was 13 months. 51 This is in large part due to <strong>the</strong> use of “Fast-Track” plea<br />

offers by <strong>the</strong> US government, in which defendants receive automatic reductions in<br />

calculations of offense level in exchange for waiving certain rights and agreeing to faster<br />

conclusion of <strong>the</strong>ir cases. 52 But if <strong>the</strong>se Fast-Track plea offers result in sentences <strong>the</strong><br />

government considers appropriate punishment, <strong>the</strong> decrease in sentences may also<br />

indicate <strong>the</strong> US government views <strong>the</strong>se defendants as less dangerous.<br />

50 US Sentencing Commission, 2002 Annual Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics, “Table 50: Mean and Median<br />

Sentences of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines by Departure Status,”<br />

http://www.ussc.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Annual_Reports_and_Sourcebooks/2002/Table50.pdf (accessed April 25, 2013).<br />

51 Ibid.<br />

52 US Sentencing Commission, “Report on <strong>the</strong> Continuing Impact of US v. Booker on Federal Sentencing,” Part C: Immigration<br />

Offenses, 2012,<br />

http://www.ussc.gov/Legislative_and_Public_Affairs/Congressional_Testimony_and_Reports/Booker_Reports/2012_Booker<br />

/Part_C8_Immigration_Offenses.pdf (accessed April 25, 2013), p. 118.<br />

31 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | MAY 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!