13.01.2014 Views

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sentencing Commission Data: Limits and Discrepancies<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> responsibilities of <strong>the</strong> US Sentencing Commission is <strong>the</strong> collection and analysis<br />

of sentencing data from federal court judgments, indictments, and o<strong>the</strong>r relevant<br />

documents. 41 It receives and examines information on all cases in which <strong>the</strong> sentencing<br />

guidelines are applied (felonies and Class A misdemeanors, meaning misdemeanors for<br />

which <strong>the</strong> maximum sentence is one year or less but more than six months). 42<br />

Commission data on Guideline 2L1.2, for “Unlaw<strong>full</strong>y entering or remaining in <strong>the</strong> United<br />

States,” thus includes information on tens of thousands of illegal reentry cases, and a<br />

couple hundred second or subsequent illegal entry cases, but not information on firsttime<br />

convictions for illegal entry. It <strong>the</strong>refore does not provide a complete look at all<br />

illegal entry and reentry cases.<br />

The Commission’s data on <strong>the</strong> application of this guideline is also incomplete because <strong>the</strong><br />

Commission excludes from its analysis cases in which <strong>the</strong> pre-sentence <strong>report</strong>—which<br />

details a defendant’s criminal, work, and family history—is missing. In fiscal year 2011, for<br />

example, <strong>the</strong> Commission excluded 8,164 cases of illegal entry offenses because <strong>the</strong> court<br />

had waived <strong>the</strong> pre-sentence <strong>report</strong>. 43 This may explain why <strong>the</strong> Commission’s total number<br />

of illegal entry offense cases each year is significantly lower than <strong>the</strong> number of convictions<br />

for illegal entry and reentry <strong>report</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> Transaction Records Access Clearinghouse,<br />

which analyzes data received from <strong>the</strong> Executive Office of US Attorneys. 44<br />

41 US Sentencing Commission, 2011 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics, “Introduction,”<br />

http://www.ussc.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Annual_Reports_and_Sourcebooks/2011/sbtoc11.htm (accessed March 28, 2013).<br />

42 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> email correspondence with Christine Kitchens, US Sentencing Commission, Office of Research and<br />

Data, February 28, 2013; and telephone interviews with Christine Kitchens, March 4, 2013 and April 18, 2013. See also 18 US<br />

Code Section 3559, Sentencing Classification of Offenses.<br />

43 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> email correspondence and interviews with Christine Kitchens; and US Sentencing Commission,<br />

“Report on <strong>the</strong> Continuing Impact of US v. Booker on Federal Sentencing,” 2012,<br />

http://www.ussc.gov/Legislative_and_Public_Affairs/Congressional_Testimony_and_Reports/Booker_Reports/2012_Booker<br />

/Part_A.pdf (accessed April 25, 2013), p. 52.<br />

44 For example, <strong>the</strong> Commission <strong>report</strong>ed 21,487 cases in which Guideline 2L1.2 was applied in fiscal year 2011. TRAC,<br />

however, <strong>report</strong>ed 33,602 convictions for illegal reentry and 33,044 convictions for illegal entry in fiscal year 2011. Even if we<br />

limit comparison of <strong>the</strong> Commission’s cases to TRAC’s data on illegal reentry convictions, <strong>the</strong>re is a difference of 12,115 cases.<br />

25 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | MAY 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!