Download the full report - Human Rights Watch
Download the full report - Human Rights Watch
Download the full report - Human Rights Watch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sentencing Commission Data: Limits and Discrepancies<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> responsibilities of <strong>the</strong> US Sentencing Commission is <strong>the</strong> collection and analysis<br />
of sentencing data from federal court judgments, indictments, and o<strong>the</strong>r relevant<br />
documents. 41 It receives and examines information on all cases in which <strong>the</strong> sentencing<br />
guidelines are applied (felonies and Class A misdemeanors, meaning misdemeanors for<br />
which <strong>the</strong> maximum sentence is one year or less but more than six months). 42<br />
Commission data on Guideline 2L1.2, for “Unlaw<strong>full</strong>y entering or remaining in <strong>the</strong> United<br />
States,” thus includes information on tens of thousands of illegal reentry cases, and a<br />
couple hundred second or subsequent illegal entry cases, but not information on firsttime<br />
convictions for illegal entry. It <strong>the</strong>refore does not provide a complete look at all<br />
illegal entry and reentry cases.<br />
The Commission’s data on <strong>the</strong> application of this guideline is also incomplete because <strong>the</strong><br />
Commission excludes from its analysis cases in which <strong>the</strong> pre-sentence <strong>report</strong>—which<br />
details a defendant’s criminal, work, and family history—is missing. In fiscal year 2011, for<br />
example, <strong>the</strong> Commission excluded 8,164 cases of illegal entry offenses because <strong>the</strong> court<br />
had waived <strong>the</strong> pre-sentence <strong>report</strong>. 43 This may explain why <strong>the</strong> Commission’s total number<br />
of illegal entry offense cases each year is significantly lower than <strong>the</strong> number of convictions<br />
for illegal entry and reentry <strong>report</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> Transaction Records Access Clearinghouse,<br />
which analyzes data received from <strong>the</strong> Executive Office of US Attorneys. 44<br />
41 US Sentencing Commission, 2011 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics, “Introduction,”<br />
http://www.ussc.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Annual_Reports_and_Sourcebooks/2011/sbtoc11.htm (accessed March 28, 2013).<br />
42 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> email correspondence with Christine Kitchens, US Sentencing Commission, Office of Research and<br />
Data, February 28, 2013; and telephone interviews with Christine Kitchens, March 4, 2013 and April 18, 2013. See also 18 US<br />
Code Section 3559, Sentencing Classification of Offenses.<br />
43 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> email correspondence and interviews with Christine Kitchens; and US Sentencing Commission,<br />
“Report on <strong>the</strong> Continuing Impact of US v. Booker on Federal Sentencing,” 2012,<br />
http://www.ussc.gov/Legislative_and_Public_Affairs/Congressional_Testimony_and_Reports/Booker_Reports/2012_Booker<br />
/Part_A.pdf (accessed April 25, 2013), p. 52.<br />
44 For example, <strong>the</strong> Commission <strong>report</strong>ed 21,487 cases in which Guideline 2L1.2 was applied in fiscal year 2011. TRAC,<br />
however, <strong>report</strong>ed 33,602 convictions for illegal reentry and 33,044 convictions for illegal entry in fiscal year 2011. Even if we<br />
limit comparison of <strong>the</strong> Commission’s cases to TRAC’s data on illegal reentry convictions, <strong>the</strong>re is a difference of 12,115 cases.<br />
25 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | MAY 2013