13.01.2014 Views

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

Download the full report - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

entry and reentry prosecutions can be at cross purposes with ano<strong>the</strong>r goal of US<br />

immigration law—<strong>the</strong> recognition and protection of genuine refugees.<br />

Second, charging such individuals with illegal entry or reentry contravenes a fundamental<br />

principle of international refugee law: asylum seekers should not be penalized for using<br />

improper means to enter <strong>the</strong> country where <strong>the</strong>y are seeking asylum. Article 31(1) of <strong>the</strong><br />

1951 Refugee Convention states, “The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on<br />

account of <strong>the</strong>ir illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory<br />

where <strong>the</strong>ir life or freedom was threatened in <strong>the</strong> sense of Article 1, enter or are present in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir territory without authorization, provided <strong>the</strong>y present <strong>the</strong>mselves without delay to <strong>the</strong><br />

authorities and show good cause for <strong>the</strong>ir illegal entry or presence.” 169 The protections of<br />

article 31 have been interpreted to include asylum seekers (those whose claims have not<br />

yet been adjudicated) because it cannot be determined at <strong>the</strong> point of entry whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

person qualifies as a refugee or not. 170<br />

Ordinarily, when a US Border Patrol agent apprehends a non-citizen who expresses a fear<br />

of returning to his or her native country, CBP is supposed to refer <strong>the</strong> individual to a US<br />

Citizenship and Immigration Services asylum officer, who will provide a “credible fear<br />

interview,” in which <strong>the</strong> non-citizen is given a chance to explain his or her fear. If <strong>the</strong><br />

person passes <strong>the</strong> credible fear interview, <strong>the</strong> case will be referred to an immigration judge<br />

for proceedings to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r he or she should be granted asylum or ano<strong>the</strong>r form<br />

of relief under international law. 171 If an asylum seeker has been previously removed,<br />

however, CBP would refer <strong>the</strong> person to a “reasonable fear interview,” which has a higher<br />

standard of proof, but also allows <strong>the</strong> asylum seeker to eventually have his or her claim<br />

reviewed by an immigration judge. 172<br />

169 1951 Refugee Convention, art. 31(1) (emphasis added).<br />

170 See United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, “Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards relating to <strong>the</strong><br />

Detention of Asylum Seekers,” February 26, 1999, http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?docid=3c2b3f844<br />

(accessed May 10, 2013).<br />

171 US Citizenship and Immigration Services, “Obtaining Asylum in <strong>the</strong> United States,” last updated March 10, 2011,<br />

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=dab9f067e3183210Vg<br />

nVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=f39d3e4d77d73210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD (accessed April 10, 2013).<br />

172 US Citizenship and Immigration Services, “Questions & Answers: Reasonable Fear Screenings,” last updated September 4, 2009,<br />

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=b1b2549bf0683210Vg<br />

nVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=f39d3e4d77d73210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD (accessed April 10, 2013).<br />

TURNING MIGRANTS INTO CRIMINALS 64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!