15.01.2014 Views

Gillian Clark, Christianity and Roman Society - Huntington University

Gillian Clark, Christianity and Roman Society - Huntington University

Gillian Clark, Christianity and Roman Society - Huntington University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BOOK REVIEWS 149<br />

George M. Marsden, Fundamentalism <strong>and</strong> American Culture, Second ed. New<br />

York: Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press, 2006. Pp. xvi + 351. $16.95.<br />

Reviewed by Daniel K. Williams, <strong>University</strong> of West Georgia<br />

George Marsden’s Fundamentalism <strong>and</strong> American Culture, a study of conservative<br />

American Protestant theology from 1875 to 1925, transformed the field of American<br />

religious history when it first appeared in 1980. After this book’s publication, no scholar<br />

could write about the history of American fundamentalism without referring to Marsden.<br />

<strong>Christianity</strong> Today named it to their one hundred “Books of the Century.” Now, twentyfive<br />

years after its publication, Marsden has updated his original text by adding a thirtypage<br />

epilogue that suggests new approaches to underst<strong>and</strong>ing the resurgence of<br />

“fundamentalistic evangelicalism” in the late-twentieth <strong>and</strong> early-twenty-first centuries.<br />

The original edition of Fundamentalism <strong>and</strong> American Culture was revolutionary,<br />

because it presented an intellectual history of fundamentalism, which most scholars had<br />

previously assumed was a contradiction in terms. From H.L. Mencken’s snide<br />

denigrations of fundamentalists in the 1920s to Ernest S<strong>and</strong>een’s historical research in the<br />

early 1970s, most pundits <strong>and</strong> scholars who examined fundamentalism, including the<br />

eminent historian Richard Hofstadter in Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1963),<br />

treated it as an anti-intellectual, reactionary movement that would likely fade away once<br />

Americans had fully adjusted to the stresses of modernity, or else, like S<strong>and</strong>een, they<br />

viewed it solely as a product of premillennial eschatology.<br />

But Marsden went beyond these earlier interpretations by showing that<br />

fundamentalism was broader than millenarianism <strong>and</strong> that, contrary to Hofstadter’s<br />

assertion, it had roots in a philosophical tradition. Fundamentalists were not merely<br />

reactionaries, Marsden argued; instead, they were adherents of the philosophy of Scottish<br />

Common Sense Realism, a worldview that held that God’s truth was equally accessible to<br />

every rational person through the revelation of nature <strong>and</strong> Scripture. Most American<br />

Protestants had been Common Sense Realists before the Civil War, but in the 1870s<br />

many of the nation’s leading Protestant ministers began championing a new liberal<br />

theology that viewed much of the Bible as metaphorical, rather than literal, <strong>and</strong> that<br />

identified the coming of the kingdom of God with scientific progress <strong>and</strong> the<br />

advancement of “civilization.” Common Sense Realists, who maintained control at<br />

Princeton <strong>University</strong> for a short time, <strong>and</strong> at Wheaton College for a much longer period,<br />

objected to this new theology <strong>and</strong> were determined to resist it. At the same time, the rapid<br />

spread of dispensational premillennialism <strong>and</strong> a Wesleyan holiness movement added a<br />

theological framework <strong>and</strong> pietistic dimension to the emerging fundamentalist<br />

movement. The horrors of World War I <strong>and</strong> the Bolshevik Revolution, followed by the<br />

ascendancy of liberal Protestantism <strong>and</strong> the increasing emphasis on Darwinism in school<br />

textbooks convinced fundamentalists that they needed to defend their denominations <strong>and</strong><br />

communities from destructive influences by championing the “fundamentals” of the faith.<br />

But their failure to maintain control of northern Protestant denominations in the 1920s<br />

signaled their inability to reclaim the culture that they had once dominated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!