27.01.2014 Views

Stein's method, Malliavin calculus and infinite-dimensional Gaussian

Stein's method, Malliavin calculus and infinite-dimensional Gaussian

Stein's method, Malliavin calculus and infinite-dimensional Gaussian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Maxima. Suppose that X (h i ), i = 1; :::; m <strong>and</strong> h i 2 H, is a …nite subset of some isonormal<br />

<strong>Gaussian</strong> process, such that the span of h i has dimension m. Consider<br />

F =<br />

max X (h i) :<br />

i=1;:::;m<br />

Then, F 2 D 1;2 (indeed, (z 1 ; :::; z m ) 7! max z i is Lipschitz), the r<strong>and</strong>om variable<br />

I 0 = arg max X (h i)<br />

i=1;:::;m<br />

is well de…ned, <strong>and</strong> one has that<br />

DF = h I0 .<br />

This kind of results can also be extended to continuous-time <strong>Gaussian</strong> processes. For<br />

isntance, if W = fW t : t 2 [0; 1]g is a st<strong>and</strong>ard Brownian motion initialized at zero, then<br />

M = sup t2[0;1] W t 2 D 1;2 , <strong>and</strong><br />

D t M = 1 [0;T ] (t) ,<br />

where T is the unique r<strong>and</strong>om point where W attains its maximum.<br />

7.2 Divergences<br />

7.2.1 De…nition <strong>and</strong> characterization of the domain<br />

Let X = fX (h) : h 2 Hg be an isonormal <strong>Gaussian</strong> process over some real separable Hilbert<br />

space H. We will now study the divergence operator , which is de…ned as the adjoint of the<br />

derivative D. Recall that D is a closed <strong>and</strong> unbounded operator from D 1;2 L 2 ( (X)) into<br />

L 2 ( (X) ; H), so that the domain of the operator will be some suitable subset of L 2 ( (X) ; H).<br />

De…nition 7.3 The domain of the divergence operator , denoted by dom (), is the collection<br />

of all r<strong>and</strong>om elements u 2 L 2 ( (X) ; H) such that, for every F 2 D 1;2 ,<br />

<br />

E hu; DF i H<br />

cE F 2 1=2<br />

, (7.14)<br />

where c is a constant depending on u (<strong>and</strong> not on F ). For every u 2 dom (), the r<strong>and</strong>om<br />

variable (u) is therefore de…ned as the unique element of L 2 ( (X)) verifying<br />

E hu; DF i H<br />

<br />

= E [F (u)] ; (7.15)<br />

for every F 2 D 1;2 (note that the existence of (u) is ensured by (7.14) <strong>and</strong> by the Riesz<br />

Representation Theorem). Relation (7.15) is called an integration by parts formula.<br />

Remark. By selecting F = 1 in (7.15), one deduces that E [ (u)] = 0, for every u 2 dom ().<br />

Example. Fix h 2 H. Since, by Cauchy-Schwarz, E <br />

hh; DF i H<br />

khk H<br />

E F 2 1=2 , we<br />

deduce that h 2 dom () <strong>and</strong> also, thanks to (7.6), that (h) = X (h).<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!