27.01.2014 Views

Stein's method, Malliavin calculus and infinite-dimensional Gaussian

Stein's method, Malliavin calculus and infinite-dimensional Gaussian

Stein's method, Malliavin calculus and infinite-dimensional Gaussian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.3 A non-central limit theorem (with bounds)<br />

We now present (without proofs) two statements concerning the Gamma approximation of multiple<br />

integrals of even order q 2. The …rst result, which is taken from [57], provides an explcit<br />

representation for the quantities appearing on the RHS of (9.11) <strong>and</strong> (9.12).<br />

Proposition 10.4 (See [57]) Let q 2 be an even integer, <strong>and</strong> let G = I q (g), where g 2 H q .<br />

Then,<br />

where<br />

E[(2 + 2G hDG; DL 1 Gi H ) 2 ] = E[(2 + 2G q 1 kDGk 2 H )2 ] (10.15)<br />

(2 q! kgk 2 H q)2 +<br />

+q 2 X<br />

1<br />

c q =<br />

(q=2)!<br />

q 1<br />

q=2 1<br />

r2f1;:::;q 1g<br />

r6=q=2<br />

4<br />

2<br />

=<br />

(q=2)!<br />

q 1 4<br />

(2q 2r)!(r 1)! 2 kg r gk 2 +<br />

r 1<br />

H 2(q r)<br />

q<br />

q=2<br />

+4q! c 1<br />

q g e q=2 g g 2 H q ;<br />

2<br />

: (10.16)<br />

The next statement, which is a main result of [56], contains a “non-central” analogous of<br />

Theorem 10.1. Recall the de…nition of the centered Gamma r<strong>and</strong>om variables F (), > 0,<br />

given in (8.2).<br />

Theorem 10.3 (See [56]) Fix > 0, as well as an even integer q 2. De…ne c q as in (10.16).<br />

Then, for any sequence ff k g k1 H q verifying<br />

lim q!kf kk 2 H<br />

= lim E I<br />

k!1 n q (f k ) 2 = Var (F ()) = 2; (10.17)<br />

k!1<br />

the following six conditions are equivalent:<br />

(i) lim k!1 E[I q (f k ) 3 ] = E[F () 3 ] = 8 <strong>and</strong> lim k!1 E[I q (f k ) 4 ] = E[F () 4 ] = 48 + 12 2 ;<br />

(ii) lim k!1 E[I q (f k ) 4 ] 12E[I q (f k ) 3 ] = 12 2 48;<br />

(iii) lim k!1 kf k<br />

e q=2 f k c q f k k H q = 0 <strong>and</strong> lim k!1 kf k<br />

e p f k k H 2(q p) = 0, for every<br />

p = 1; :::; q 1 such that p 6= q=2;<br />

(iv) lim k!1 kf k<br />

e q=2 f k c q f k k H q = 0 <strong>and</strong> lim k!1 kf k p f k k H 2(q p) = 0, for every<br />

p = 1; :::; q 1 such that p 6= q=2;<br />

(v) as k ! 1, kD[I q (f k )]k 2 H<br />

2qI q (f k ) ! 2q in L 2 ;<br />

(vi) as k ! 1, the sequence fI q (f k )g k1 converges in distribution to F ().<br />

Remark. In [56], Theorem 10.3 is not proved with Stein’s <strong>method</strong>, but rather by implementing<br />

the “di¤erential approach” initiated by Nualart <strong>and</strong> Ortiz-Latorre in [66]. However,<br />

it is not di¢ cult to see that (9.11), (9.12) <strong>and</strong> (10.15) can be combined in order to deduce an<br />

alternate proof of the implications (iv) ) (v) ) (vi).<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!