- Page 1 and 2: From Sharks to Sugar: Addressing Co
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRAT
- Page 5 and 6: Case Study #2: Untitled, 2006, Rosa
- Page 7 and 8: LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure No. Su
- Page 9 and 10: preventative conservation measure,
- Page 11 and 12: staff (in addition to conservators
- Page 13 and 14: for this unusual artwork. Although
- Page 15 and 16: artwork, quotes from the artists an
- Page 17 and 18: conference to learn how conservator
- Page 19 and 20: I interviewed Dr. Wharton, Conserva
- Page 21 and 22: For SJMA, I focused on the artwork
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 3: LIMITATIONS There are ma
- Page 25: of this artwork. For instance, wher
- Page 29 and 30: only in what he did but in what he
- Page 31 and 32: In his article “In a Pickle,” M
- Page 33 and 34: Other artists defer to the buyer to
- Page 35 and 36: Art Conservation Evolution of Art C
- Page 37 and 38: context, the author enfolds the fie
- Page 39 and 40: contemporary art. Collaboration wit
- Page 41 and 42: Often, the collections manager sets
- Page 43 and 44: Sterrett investigated the challenge
- Page 45 and 46: and employ solutions for caring for
- Page 47 and 48: understands how the materials were
- Page 49 and 50: Whether or not there is a professio
- Page 51 and 52: her art without consulting the arti
- Page 53 and 54: has been a need to access this info
- Page 55 and 56: three- determination of meaning. Th
- Page 57 and 58: that collections managers are not u
- Page 59 and 60: Past Efforts to Address the Issue S
- Page 61 and 62: department at Stedelijk Museum Aktu
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 5: FINDINGS “The Object i
- Page 65 and 66: historian pointed out that the docu
- Page 67 and 68: challenges the authenticity of the
- Page 69 and 70: INCCA-NA Database Entry Training Se
- Page 71 and 72: Even conservators who feel that the
- Page 73 and 74: Wharton sees the database as the co
- Page 75 and 76: And the works are deemed so importa
- Page 77 and 78:
Case Studies Case Study #1: Untitle
- Page 79 and 80:
interviewed, it is no surprise that
- Page 81 and 82:
Pennuto is a conservator who has be
- Page 83 and 84:
oles in the museum, which echoes th
- Page 85 and 86:
Case Study #2: Untitled, 2006, Rosa
- Page 87 and 88:
sees the piece is completely relian
- Page 89 and 90:
Are we willing to spend this much m
- Page 91 and 92:
person transporting the work to tip
- Page 93 and 94:
have with this piece, and different
- Page 95 and 96:
Conservation images of Untitled, 20
- Page 97 and 98:
Artist interview: Carlos Mollura. M
- Page 99 and 100:
We talked about his decisions to ma
- Page 101 and 102:
much about the concept, could be re
- Page 103 and 104:
so that’s the beginning of your c
- Page 105 and 106:
these particular artists happen to
- Page 107 and 108:
All staff members at museums are ov
- Page 109 and 110:
things in a certain way and develop
- Page 111 and 112:
parties in order to use the documen
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 6: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEN
- Page 115 and 116:
3. Museum professionals should cons
- Page 117 and 118:
necessarily intercept change. This
- Page 119 and 120:
7. Collections managers need access
- Page 121 and 122:
individual pieces. But if they have
- Page 123 and 124:
someone with training in collection
- Page 125 and 126:
artists with the artwork are ideal,
- Page 127 and 128:
Jennifer Levy cosmodandy@yahoo.com
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 9: BIBLIOGRAPHY AND APPENDI
- Page 131 and 132:
conservation for modern materials.
- Page 133 and 134:
Díaz, March 2005. Elise S. Haas Co
- Page 135 and 136:
Artists’ Installations and the Mu
- Page 137 and 138:
. If not, would you be willing to a
- Page 139 and 140:
Appendix B Interview Questions for
- Page 141 and 142:
Appendix C Interview Questions for
- Page 143 and 144:
Appendix D Interview Questions for