02.02.2014 Views

A DICTIONARY GBARI LANGUAGE - Roger Blench

A DICTIONARY GBARI LANGUAGE - Roger Blench

A DICTIONARY GBARI LANGUAGE - Roger Blench

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Dictionary of the Gbari Language Trial Edition <strong>Roger</strong> <strong>Blench</strong> and Musa Doma<br />

Tsumbo<br />

Yebani<br />

Zabeye-<br />

Bwabo<br />

Zegibwa<br />

Zobeye<br />

Zolo<br />

APPENDIX 5<br />

1. The Classification of Gbari<br />

LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF <strong>GBARI</strong>-SUMWAKPNA<br />

The Gwari lects are Niger-Congo languages and are usually classified as part of the Nupoid group which is<br />

part of Benue-Congo (cf. <strong>Blench</strong>, 1989). The Nupoid group consists of Nupe and related languages, Gwari,<br />

Gade and Ebira. These four subgroups are broadly co-ordinate with one another, although Nupe and Gwari<br />

are evidently more closely related to one another than to Ebira and Gade. Gwari is a highly complex nexus<br />

of interwoven lects, usually divided into two major branches, Gbagyi and Gbari, referred to together by their<br />

Hausa name, Gwari.<br />

No analysis has ever been published showing that Gwari forms a single group, but this is usually assumed<br />

from the lexicostatistic data. In a wide-ranging comparison within Nupoid, <strong>Blench</strong> (1989) gave a figure of<br />

73% cognacy between Gbagyi and Gbari, while James (1990) calculated that the maximum distance between<br />

Gwari lects was 67%. It should noted, however, that this is very similar to the cognate figures with<br />

neighbouring languages such as Kupa and Kakanda. Despite this, Gwari probably does form a unit; for<br />

example, the prefixed pluralisation marker for nouns, a- seems to occur throughout the group, in contrast to<br />

the Nupe group.<br />

The division into two major subgroups, the Gbagyi and the Gbari, is supported by the lexicostatistics (cf.<br />

James, 1990). However, some of the lects spoken between Zungeru and Minna 1 seem to show lexical<br />

innovations common to both groups. Crozier and <strong>Blench</strong> (in press) have therefore noted these lects as a<br />

tentative third subgroup. Rosenthal (p.c.) has noted that oral traditions in this region seem to suggest that<br />

these lects result from a migration of Gbagyi speakers into a Gbari area in the precolonial era. Hence the<br />

speech shows features of both subgroups. Clearly this an area that requires further research.<br />

Gbagyi are the dominant group, both numerically and politically, and this has had a number of<br />

consequences. Where speakers want to emphasise the similarity of the two peoples, they tend to assimilate<br />

differences of lexicon and pronunciation. However, where there is antagonism, speakers sometimes<br />

intentionally adopt slightly outré phonology to emphasise their distinctness. This has spilled over into<br />

informal writing systems, and some orthographic suggestions seem to underline the differences by adopting<br />

different conventions.<br />

2.Phonology<br />

The phonology of Gbari was first described by Hyman (1971) for the Gbagyi of Kuta and later by James<br />

(1990) for the ensemble of Gwari lects. The broad picture appears to be very similar throughout the group.<br />

However, one of the most complex features of Gwari are the range of allophones attributable to a single<br />

1 These people are often referred to as Gwarin Nkwa, after a common greeting. In some senses, however, this<br />

is misleading, as Nkwa! is a widespread through the Gwari area and does not therefore define a group.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!