A DICTIONARY GBARI LANGUAGE - Roger Blench
A DICTIONARY GBARI LANGUAGE - Roger Blench
A DICTIONARY GBARI LANGUAGE - Roger Blench
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Dictionary of the Gbari Language Trial Edition <strong>Roger</strong> <strong>Blench</strong> and Musa Doma<br />
Laterals<br />
Phonetically, Gbari has an ordinary lateral [l] and an alveopalatal approximant [®]. Individual speakers<br />
clearly distinguish the two sounds in their own speech The rule determining the realisation of [r] and [l] in<br />
initial position is usually that [l] is pronounced before central and back vowels and [r] before front vowels.<br />
Initial /r/ is rare and some of the words with this feature are Hausa loan-words.<br />
Although the same rule applies in non-initial position, variability between speakers is more marked. For<br />
example, in /kambulu/ 'pawpaw' there appears to be free variation between [l] and [r]. Hyman and Magaji<br />
(1970) suggested that this type of variability may be linked to speakers' familairity with the Hausa soundsystem<br />
where there are three distinct lateral phonemes.<br />
Another problem of laterals is the relation between /l/ and /n/. These two can clearly be set up as<br />
independent phonemes, as the simple CV verbs with these initial contrasts demonstrate. However, there exist<br />
a number of doublets in the language which are recognised by speakers which suggest these are in free<br />
variation in some contexts. For example;<br />
grasshopper namberi lumberi<br />
bad nabne labme<br />
Hyman and Magaji (1970) also mention this phenomenon in relation to the adaptation of Hausa loanwords<br />
and it may be that this is caused by some sort of interference.<br />
Tone-bearing nasals forming an independent syllable are so far only recorded in initial position, e.g;<br />
nkwa!<br />
nnda<br />
nca<br />
Hallo!<br />
Type of yam<br />
three<br />
The presence of the implosives /∫/ and /Î/ is most striking as these are not otherwise found in the Nupoid<br />
group. They usually correspond to the ordinary plosive forms suggesting that consonant merger has taken<br />
place -although presumably it must have occurred independently in all other branches.<br />
Nasals and Nasalization<br />
The single most difficult problem for the analysis of Gbari and for its orthography is the representation of<br />
nasals. Hyman and Magaji (1971) analysed the situation for Gbagyi of Kuta. At a surface level, almost all<br />
consonants appear to have a feature of +nasal as a release. In other words, post-nasal releases are as common<br />
as a prosodic feature such palatalization and greatly add to the phonemic inventory.<br />
An alternative interpretation is that the vowels are nasalised as in the Nupe group, but that the nasalisation<br />
has spread leftwards. One argument for this interpretation is the variability between speakers. One speaker<br />
may consistently articulate a nasal consonantal release, whereas another will sometimes nasalise the vowel.<br />
James (1990) also mentions this, giving the example of 'ear' as realised either [knúbwà] or [ku)bwa]<br />
Intermediate forms such as CNV ~ - kpnã also occur, but there is no reason to consider these distinctive.<br />
Nasalization of a vowel is realised as a bilabial nasal when the C 2 is either /b/ or /w/. Thus;<br />
4<br />
cimwa 'tree' but cinkpwe 'stool' and<br />
gbambo 'gourd' but bantu 'spirit'<br />
In some cases the nasalisation has to be analysed as affecting the consonants in both directions. For example;