02.02.2014 Views

March/April - West Virginia State Medical Association

March/April - West Virginia State Medical Association

March/April - West Virginia State Medical Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scientific Article |<br />

several “association” parameters.<br />

We did not include cases beyond<br />

2002 to increase the study “N” as the<br />

team of physicians involved in the<br />

care of these patients changed after<br />

2002. Nonetheless the current study<br />

has confirmed some of the findings<br />

in the literature but refuted other<br />

reports in the literature. Penman<br />

et al 5 found that Gastrochisis was<br />

more common in women younger<br />

than 20 years of age. Our study<br />

confirmed this with the mean<br />

age of mothers being at 20 years.<br />

We did not find any intrauterine<br />

deaths, which is different than the<br />

mortality rates of 5-12% noted in<br />

the literature. 6-8 This difference may<br />

be because of the small number<br />

of cases in our population.<br />

The primary outcome was<br />

mortality. Although a trend was<br />

noted of mortality with increasing<br />

bowel thickness, survival was not<br />

associated with bowel thickness even<br />

after the data had been controlled<br />

for gestational age as no statistical<br />

significance was achieved probably<br />

due to the small sample size.<br />

There have been some reports<br />

in the literature that IUGR has<br />

been overestimated in this group<br />

because of the smaller abdominal<br />

circumference. We omitted this<br />

measurement in our estimation and<br />

found that a significant number<br />

of babies were still born with<br />

intrauterine growth restriction.<br />

The current literature notes the<br />

presence of growth restriction in<br />

Gastrochisis babies as high as 24-<br />

67%. 7,9 This has been hypothesized<br />

to be secondary to protein loss from<br />

the exposed bowel. 10 This ultimately<br />

affects the outcome of these<br />

neonates. Our numbers are similar<br />

to those reported in the literature.<br />

We also looked at secondary<br />

outcomes (Table 2) as a marker for<br />

morbidity. There was no difference<br />

seen for bowel thickness to time<br />

to feeding, the number of days on<br />

the ventilator or the total hospital<br />

length of stay. Piper et al 11 reported<br />

that bowel thickness did affect<br />

time to feeding but we did not<br />

note that in our study. Similarly no<br />

difference was seen in dilation or<br />

delta dilation to number of days on<br />

ventilator or length of hospital stay.<br />

There was a significant association<br />

between delta dilation (at 4 mm) to<br />

time to feeding (Table 3) p < 0.007.<br />

There was no association between<br />

gestational age at birth or mode of<br />

delivery to time to feeding, length<br />

of hospital stay or number of days<br />

on ventilator. An earlier diagnosis<br />

did not affect outcome, nor did<br />

the visual appearance of the bowel<br />

at the time of birth. There was<br />

however, a significant association<br />

between the type of Gastrochisis<br />

and the length of hospital stay<br />

as well as the number of days on<br />

ventilator and time to feeding.<br />

Fetuses with complex Gastrochisis,<br />

defined as those with this condition<br />

in addition to bowel atresia, had<br />

a longer hospital stay p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!