07.02.2014 Views

2005 Proceedings - Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War

2005 Proceedings - Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War

2005 Proceedings - Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Paul Ellis Graham, Department <strong>of</strong> New York.<br />

Does that mean based on what’s been said that members, that are members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Union</strong><br />

<strong>Veterans</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>War</strong> could march in <strong>the</strong> parade in business attire. I’m not sure….<br />

Charlie Kuhn, Department <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Charlie Kuhn, Pennsylvania, what we are going to vote on is whe<strong>the</strong>r it goes back to committee<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n comes back next year to <strong>the</strong> floor here or whe<strong>the</strong>r we are going to decide it.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

That’s <strong>the</strong> amendment.<br />

Charlie Kuhn, Department <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

That’s what we are deciding right now is that correct.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

You are correct Sir.<br />

Charlie Kuhn, Department <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Okay.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

Bro<strong>the</strong>r Gro<strong>the</strong><br />

Jack Gro<strong>the</strong>, Department <strong>of</strong> Missouri<br />

We are famous for <strong>the</strong> Missouri Compromise.<br />

Encampment<br />

Laughter.<br />

Jack Gro<strong>the</strong>, Department <strong>of</strong> Missouri<br />

Gentlemen. The problem involves <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> business suit. Personally, I wouldn’t mind<br />

seeing some-what those camp followers would look like in a parade. You know, business - that is<br />

putting it to an extreme and a little levity. What I am trying to say is, look at <strong>the</strong> group here. We can<br />

have various ideas. I think <strong>the</strong> gentlemen with <strong>the</strong> blue blazers, <strong>the</strong> emblem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sons</strong>, blue, khaki,<br />

whatever. If <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sons</strong> would decide on what <strong>the</strong> broad definition <strong>of</strong> business suit would be or attire, and<br />

it comes to <strong>the</strong> point where, yes <strong>the</strong>y can. I’m not expressing my opinion on yeah or neigh, but that<br />

might help some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> situation.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

Thank you. I think we have heard enough comments and I think if it was sent back to committee<br />

that would be one opportunity that <strong>the</strong>y would have to refine <strong>the</strong> language. There is a motion and a<br />

second on <strong>the</strong> floor to accept this—<strong>the</strong>se rules for this year and to send it back to committee for<br />

refinements for future Remembrance Day Events, if I have restated that motion correctly. Close, alright.<br />

All those in favor say aye.<br />

Encampment<br />

Aye.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

Opposed?<br />

Encampment<br />

No, nay.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

Okay <strong>the</strong>n we will take a hand vote. All those in favor raise your hand. National Secretary, if<br />

you would and Bro<strong>the</strong>r Chaplain, will you do a count as well.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

Alright put your arms down. Those against please raise your hands.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

The nays have it. Bro<strong>the</strong>r Kuhn.<br />

Charlie Kuhn, Department <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Bro<strong>the</strong>r Commander, I would amend my motion into two parts since two through nine are no<br />

brainers I would move you that we accept number two through nine and <strong>the</strong>n we will discuss one.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!