07.02.2014 Views

2005 Proceedings - Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War

2005 Proceedings - Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War

2005 Proceedings - Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

Bro<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong>re has been a motion and a second made and we’ll hear two more points <strong>of</strong><br />

discussion starting with Bro<strong>the</strong>r Medert.<br />

Brigadier General David V. Medert, Commanding General SVR<br />

Commander-in-Chief, to you and <strong>the</strong> Bro<strong>the</strong>rs assembled. Along with <strong>the</strong> amendment that he is<br />

proposing, if we are going to go ahead and permit this to happen and I support well a lot <strong>of</strong> people are<br />

saying, I understand what <strong>the</strong>y are saying. I would like to suggest, since we are voting on whe<strong>the</strong>r to<br />

permit <strong>the</strong>m to wear civilian clo<strong>the</strong>s or not, that if we do, that <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Allied Orders and <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Sons</strong> that are going to be in civilian attire, if you are a Son, you are in a blue sport coat, white shirt and<br />

tie and <strong>the</strong>y march ahead <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uniform branches. They are going to lead <strong>the</strong> parade. The <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Union</strong> <strong>Veterans</strong> and all those will lead <strong>the</strong> parade and <strong>the</strong>n following that point on is going to be your<br />

uniformed people. Because I’ve got to stand up and address <strong>the</strong> entire assembly <strong>of</strong> people up <strong>the</strong>re on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Parade Commander’s Meeting and say this is what’s going to be permitted. And I already know<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is going to be some <strong>of</strong> what I like to use, Urinary Olympics that’s going to arise. So I think if you<br />

are going to go ahead and allow people in civilian clo<strong>the</strong>s to dress, which I do understand why we want<br />

to do that. They lead <strong>the</strong> parade and <strong>the</strong>n you got <strong>the</strong> SVR Color Guard and <strong>the</strong> SVR General Staff and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> uniformed people after that following in as Bro<strong>the</strong>r Kuhn goes ahead and puts <strong>the</strong>m in. That<br />

would be my suggestion.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

Thank you Bro<strong>the</strong>r. One more point <strong>of</strong> discussion.<br />

Stuart Stefany, Department <strong>of</strong> Illinois<br />

I really don’t see what <strong>the</strong> issue was with having <strong>the</strong> National Guard shut out. I think everybody<br />

that served in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>War</strong> served from different states and militias. Illinois, Wisconsin, <strong>the</strong>y’re all<br />

National Guard people. I don’t see why modern National Guard be closed out. Why don’t we have a<br />

parade where everyone is in period uniform and people in modern uniform, who are serving our country,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> back?<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

Thank you Bro<strong>the</strong>r Stewart. Do you have a point <strong>of</strong> information Bro<strong>the</strong>r McNulty?<br />

John McNulty, Department <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

I have a point to make.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

Alright.<br />

John McNulty, Department <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

I propose a friendly amendment to <strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> allowing <strong>the</strong> five Allied Orders to parade in<br />

civilian attire. I would add to that that <strong>the</strong>y must wear <strong>the</strong>ir Membership Badge.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

And Bro<strong>the</strong>r that introduced <strong>the</strong> motion do you accept that? Thank you. There is a motion and a<br />

second.<br />

Dale Theetge, Department <strong>of</strong> New York<br />

Can I possibly talk one more time? Seriously, it is a valid point that this should also include <strong>the</strong><br />

Daughters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Confederacy and <strong>Sons</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Confederacy. You cannot avoid that <strong>the</strong>y march in<br />

uniform if somebody from those organizations comes and wants to march in a proper business attire <strong>the</strong>y<br />

should be allowed.<br />

Commander-in-Chief Stephen Michaels<br />

That would have to be addressed separately as <strong>the</strong> motion only refers to <strong>the</strong>se Allied Orders that<br />

are listed in front <strong>of</strong> you, at this time.<br />

Dale Theetge, Department <strong>of</strong> New York<br />

I’ll make it a friendly amendment.<br />

Charlie Kuhn, Department <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

I’ll second that friendly amendment. Commander-in-Chief, Would you like me to read this?<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!