Evaluation of General Budget Support: Synthesis Report - Belgium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of GBS – Synthesis Report Hjertholm et al (1998). Macroeconomic Issues in Foreign Aid. Paper From Foreign Aid and Development: Lessons of Experience and Directions for the Future. P. Hjertholm, J. Laursen and H. White. (October 9–10, 1998) Copenhagen: Development Economics Research Group (DERG) at the Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen. High Level Forum (2005a). Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. High Level Forum (2005b). Baselines and suggested targets for the 12 Indicators of Progress – Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness (updated on August 3, 2005). Hodges, T. and Tibana, R. (2004). Political Economy of the Budget in Mozambique. Complete Final Manuscript. (12 December 2004). Holmes, M. and Evans, A. (2003). A Review of Experience in Implementing Medium Term Expenditure Frameworks in a PRSP Context: A Synthesis of Eight Country Studies. (November 2003) London: ODI. Hubbard, M. (2004). The Use of Different Aid Instruments in Asia. Synthesis Report. Birmingham: International Development Department, University of Birmingham. IDD & Associates (2005). Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support: Inception Report. (June 2005) Glasgow: DFID. IDS (2002). Independent Evaluation of Seco’s Budget Support Programme. (May 2002) Brighton: IDS. IMF (2001). Code for Fiscal Transparency. (February 28, 2001) Washington, DC: IMF. IMF (2003a). Aligning the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) and the Poverty Reduction Strategy Credits (PRSC). Washington, DC: IMF. IMF (2003b). Aligning the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) and the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) Approach: Issues and Options. (April 25, 2003) Washington, DC: IMF. IMF (2003c). Fiscal Adjustment in IMF-Supported Programs. Washington, DC: IMF. IMF (2004). Vietnam – Evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) Process and Arrangements Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). Washington, DC: IMF. IMF (2005a). Policy Support and Signalling in Low-Income Countries. (June 10, 2005) Washington, DC: IMF. IMF (2005b). Implementation of the Policy Support Instrument. (September 2, 2005) Washington, DC. IMF and World Bank (2002). Development Effectiveness and Scaling Up: Lessons and Challenges from Case Studies. DC2002-0018. Washington, DC: Development Committee. IMF and World Bank (2003a). A Concept Note on Aligning Donor Budget Support with the PRSP Process. Washington, DC: IMF and World Bank. IMF and World Bank (2003b). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers – Progress in Implementation. (September 12, 2003) Washington, DC: IMF and World Bank. IMF and World Bank (2004a). Nicaragua – Evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) Process and Arrangements Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). Washington, DC: IMF and World Bank. IMF and World Bank (2004b). Republic of Mozambique – Evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) Process and Arrangements Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). Washington, DC: IMF and World Bank. IMF and World Bank (2004c). The United Republic of Tanzania: Evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) Process and Arrangements Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). Washington, DC: IMF and World Bank. IOB (2003). Results of International Debt Relief 1990–1999 (with case studies of Bolivia, Jamaica, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Peru, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia). IOB Evaluations NR 292. The Hague: Policy and Operations Evaluation Department, IOB. (136)
Bibliography Isaksen, J. (2005). The Budget Process and Corruption. U4 Utstein Anti-Corruption Resource Centre. U4 Issue 3:2005. Chr. Michelsen Institute. Jennes, G. and de Groot, A. (2003). A Review of Experience in Implementing Medium Term Expenditure Frameworks in a PRSP Context: Country Case Study 2: Assessment of Burkina Faso’s MTEF. London: ODI. JICA (2004). Final Report, Forum on Program-Based Approaches in Asia: Adapting to Diversity, 1–3 June 2004. LENPA forum. (July 14, 2004) Tokyo: JICA. Johnson, J. and Wasty, S. (1993). Borrower ownership of adjustment programs and the political economy of reform. Discussion Paper No.199. Washington DC: World Bank. Jones, S. (2000). The Limits of Conditionality: Implications for Bilateral Donor Support for Sector Wide Approaches. Copenhagen: DANIDA. Jones, S. and Lawson, A. (2000). Moving from Project to Programmatic Aid. OED Working Paper Series No.5. Washington, DC: World Bank. Kaufmann et al (1999a). Aggregating Governance Indicators. D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay and P. Zoido- Lobaton. Policy Research Working Paper No.2195. Washington, DC: World Bank. Kaufmann et al (1999b). Governance Matters. D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay and P. Zoido-Lobaton. Policy Research Working Paper No.2196. Washington, DC: World Bank. Kaufmann et al (2004). Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996–2002. D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay and M. Mastruzzi. Policy Research Working Paper No.3106. Washington, DC: World Bank. Kaufmann et al (2005). Governance Matters IV: Governance Research Indicators Project. Indicators for 1996–2004. D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay and M. Mastruzzi. Draft. (May 9, 2005) Washington, DC: World Bank. Kaufmann, D. and Kraay, A. (2003). Governance and Growth: Causality which way? Evidence for the World, in brief. Washington, DC: World Bank. Keefer, P. and Khemani, S. (2003). Democracy, Public Expenditure and the Poor. Policy Research Working Paper No.3164. Washington, DC: World Bank. Keefer, P. (2005). Clientelism, credibility and the policy choices of young democracies. (September 2005) Development Research Group, World Bank, Khan, M.H. (2004). State Failure in Developing Countries and Institutional Reform Strategies. Paper presented at Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics – Europe 2003. Washington, DC: World Bank. Khan, M.S. and Sharma, S. (2003). IMF Conditionality and Country Ownership of Adjustment Programs. The World Bank Research Observer, Vol.18, No.2, pp.227-248. Killick, T. (2004). Politics, Evidence and the New Aid Agenda. Development Policy Review, Vol.22, No.1, pp.5-29. Killick, T. (2004). Monitoring Partnership-Based Aid Relationships: A Note. Development Policy Review, Vol.22, No.2, pp.229-334. Killick et al (2005). Perfect Partners? The performance of Programme Aid Partners in Mozambique 2004. T. Killick, C.N. Castelo Branco and R. Gerster. A report to the Programme Aid partners and Government of Mozambique (May 2005). Klump, R. and Bonschab, T. (2004). Operationalising Pro- Poor Growth: A joint initiative of AFD, BMZ (GTZ, KfW Development Bank), DFID, and the World Bank. A Country Case Study on Vietnam. Frankfurt: University of Frankfurt. Knack, S. (2000). Aid Dependence and the Quality of Governance: A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis. Policy Research Working Paper No.2396. Washington, DC: World Bank. Knack, S. and Manning, N. (2000). Toward More Operationally Relevant Indicators of Governance. PREM Notes 49. Washington, DC: World Bank. (137)
Page 1 and 2:
Evaluation of General Budget Suppor
Page 3:
JOINT EVALUATION OF GENERAL BUDGET
Page 6 and 7:
Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis Repor
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
(x) Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis R
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
(S22) Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
(4) Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis R
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Level 0 (Entry conditions) GOVERNME
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
(26) Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
(32) Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Rwa Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis R
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123: Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis Repor
Page 152 and 153: (116) Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis
Page 164 and 165: (128) Evaluation of GBS - Synthesis
Page 189 and 190: Annex A: Governance Indicators for
Page 199 and 200: Annex B: Summary of Financial Flows
Page 213 and 214: Annex C: Synthesis of Country Repor
Page 223 and 224:
Annex C: Synthesis of Country Repor
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Annex D: PFM Assessments 10. The sc
Page 233 and 234:
Annex D: PFM Assessments and non-su
Page 235 and 236:
Annex D: PFM Assessments Table D1:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Annex E: Synthesis of Causality Fin
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Annex F: Study Process 9. The evalu
Page 263:
JOINT EVALUATION OF GENERAL BUDGET
Page 266 and 267:
(ii) Appendix Evaluation of GBS - S
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
(32) Appendix Evaluation of GBS - S
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
(46) Appendix Evaluation of GBS - S
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348:
show all

Evaluation of General Budget Support: Synthesis Report - Belgium

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?