16.02.2014 Views

Technology & Innovation Management: - PICMET Conference

Technology & Innovation Management: - PICMET Conference

Technology & Innovation Management: - PICMET Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PAPERS AND PANELS<br />

drawn from analysis of survey results of major Australian companies<br />

and an analysis of outcomes from a recent workshop for IT managers.<br />

MD-03.3 - Growth Through Technological <strong>Innovation</strong>: Entrepreneurial<br />

Distributed <strong>Innovation</strong> for Business Renewal<br />

Georges Haour, IMD- International Institute for <strong>Management</strong><br />

Development<br />

This paper discusses companies’ growth by effectively leveraging<br />

technical innovations for two types of firms: technical start-ups and<br />

large technology-intensive firms. It is argued that these two types of<br />

companies are rapidly becoming more dependant on each other and<br />

that following the precursor model of the biotechnological sector,<br />

firms will increasingly spin in, as well as spin off innovation projects<br />

at various stages of maturity. The framework of a distributed<br />

innovation system is presented, which involves a variety of actors.<br />

Firms indeed need to organise accordingly and, for this, should learn<br />

from the practices of totally different sectors, such as the entertainment<br />

industry; also, the mission of the Research and Development<br />

(R&D) function will have to be redefined.<br />

MD-04 Monday, July 26, 1999<br />

15:30 - 17:00 Parlor B<br />

Program/ Project <strong>Management</strong> 3<br />

Chair: Leonard J Olive, Bureau of Transportation Engineering and<br />

Development<br />

MD-04.1 - Organizational Context for Project <strong>Management</strong><br />

Charles Keating, Old Dominion University<br />

There is little debate concerning the utility of project management<br />

tools and methods for planning, scheduling, and control of temporary<br />

initiatives to produce a unique product or service. This paper<br />

develops a framework for understanding the assumptions necessary<br />

for effective deployment of the project management approach.<br />

Understanding the degree to which an organization is compatible<br />

with these assumptions may determine the readiness to effectively<br />

deploy project management methods.<br />

MD-04.2 - Using Organizational Engineering to Build Defect Free<br />

Systems, On Schedule and Within Budget<br />

Joseph Kasser, University of Maryland<br />

Today’s software and systems development life cycle paradigm is<br />

characterized by large cost overruns, schedule slips, and dramatic<br />

performance deficiencies in weapon, C4I, and automated information<br />

systems. This paper describes an alternative paradigm that can<br />

produce defect free systems on schedule and within budget.<br />

MD-04.3 - Multiproject <strong>Management</strong> System Implementation<br />

Iffet Iyigun, Arcelik A.S. - R&D Center<br />

In this paper, a multi-project management system implementation for<br />

an R&D Center, organized under a strong project matrix structure<br />

with more than 100 employees, is discussed. The system is based on<br />

the integration of a commercial project management software coupled<br />

with database application. The implementation process along<br />

with the needs analysis and lessons learned during the implementation<br />

are discussed.<br />

MD-04.4 - Risk Prevention in Outsourced Projects<br />

Jozsef Gyorkos, University of Maribor<br />

Ivan Rozman, University of Maribor<br />

Marin Silic, Government Centre of Informatics, Rep. of Slovenia<br />

In this paper experience gained by quality assurance for large outsourced<br />

IT projects is described. An outline of the paper follows: 1)<br />

Introduction (environment and problem description, multidisciplinary<br />

projects); 2) The approach (the scope of the quality system,<br />

assessment group, principles (product and process focus) and<br />

results); 3) Lessons learned (risk prevention and group coordination,<br />

balancing between formality and schedule).<br />

PANEL: MD-05 Monday, July 26, 1999<br />

15:30 - 17:00 Parlor C<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Education 2: Innovative MOT Education<br />

for the New Millennium: University Programs that Combine Science,<br />

Engineering, and Business<br />

Moderator: Anne D Henriksen, James Madison University<br />

Panelist(s): Richard M Roberds, James Madison University<br />

William Flannery, University of Texas-San Antonio<br />

Russell Jamison, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign<br />

Successful MOT requires a combination of skills in science, engineering,<br />

technology, and business. Effective MOT education must<br />

therefore combine training in all of these areas. But there are many<br />

bureaucratic and cultural barriers to implementing MOT programs<br />

that cross discipline and institutional boundaries. This panel will<br />

consist of three directors of interdisciplinary educational programs,<br />

at both the graduate and undergraduate level, who are successfully<br />

linking technical and business training. In two of the cases, the programs<br />

involve at least two different colleges within the university,<br />

but in the third, a new degree program has been formed that fundamentally<br />

integrates science, engineering, technology, and business<br />

throughout the curriculum.<br />

MD-06 Monday, July 26, 1999<br />

15:30 - 17:00 Studio<br />

Information/ Knowledge <strong>Management</strong> 3<br />

Chair: Janice E Carrillo, Washington University<br />

MD-06.1 - Achieving Return on Critical Knowledge<br />

Joyce Thompsen, Achieve Global<br />

Critical Knowledge Areas represent unique bodies of knowledge<br />

which lie at the core of the value proposition for an enterprise. A new<br />

business model entitled Return on Critical Knowledge, or ROCK, can<br />

be used for managing these Critical Knowledge Areas in an integrated<br />

strategic approach. This new model and a case study for identifying<br />

and measuring Critical Knowledge Areas are presented.<br />

MD-06.2 - Leveraged Knowledge Creation: Role of Technical<br />

Services as External Sources of Knowledge<br />

Christiane Hipp, Mannesmann Pilotentwicklung<br />

Oliver Gassmann, Schindler Lifts Ltd.<br />

Companies have to face the fact that research and development is<br />

becoming increasingly complex and product cycles shorter. This<br />

forces firms to reorganize their innovation and learning process by<br />

trying to combine internal know-how with all kinds of external<br />

sources of knowledge. This paper will analyze the role of specialized<br />

technical services and their contribution to the performance of their<br />

customers.<br />

MD-06.3 - The Link Between Successful Process Change and<br />

Knowledge Creation<br />

Janice Carrillo, Washington University<br />

Cheryl Gaimon, Georgia Institute of <strong>Technology</strong><br />

The critical link between successful process change and knowledge<br />

creation is examined. Specifically, a model is given to investigate the<br />

impact of investment in preparation and training to enhance process<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!