18.02.2014 Views

wireless ad hoc networking

wireless ad hoc networking

wireless ad hoc networking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fieldbus for Distributed Control Applications 577<br />

PCI architectures are the primary contenders. The most important development<br />

has been the <strong>ad</strong>option of PMC (PCI Mezzanine Card) by the VMEbus<br />

community. The industrial and real-time computation community will soon<br />

have a wide choice of standardized solutions based upon two important<br />

building blocks: VME and PCI. 5<br />

All such buses were aimed at specific market needs and were relatively<br />

independent from any given chip. The buses are designed mostly for<br />

signal-processing and intensive data-processing applications such as r<strong>ad</strong>ar,<br />

sonar, imaging, management information system (MIS) servers, transactional<br />

banking applications, Ethernet, integrated service digital network<br />

(ISDN), industrial control where fast data processing is desired, and so<br />

on. 6 The signal-processing architecture is based on digital signal processors<br />

(DSP) boards. Although the DSP performance is very high, the resultant<br />

architectures are often proprietary. At the same time, it is worth mentioning<br />

that most of such bus architectures entertain centralized control implementation.<br />

Although some of the buses are capable of being configured onto<br />

distributed architecture, the overall installation cost seems to be high when<br />

compared with fieldbus-based control implementation.<br />

22.2 Review on Distributed Control<br />

The rapid progress of internationalization following World War II has h<strong>ad</strong> an<br />

enormous impact on manufacturing industries as it has become the cornerstone<br />

of many economic activities. During the 1970s most industrial control<br />

systems were relay-based, with nearly a one-to-one I/O ratio. Control systems,<br />

consisting of a group of relays, were capable of controlling machine<br />

tools, conveyor systems, and other mechanical components such as motors,<br />

transportation vehicles, etc. within rugged environments. To increase communication<br />

capabilities, implementation simplicity, cost–performance ratio,<br />

reliability, and capability, PLC-based control systems emerged in 1969. A<br />

PLC is a programmable electronic device that controls machines and processes.<br />

It uses a memory to store instructions and execute specific functions<br />

that include on/off control, timing, counting, sequencing, and arithmetic<br />

and data handling. Functioning as relay replacements, the PLCs are more<br />

reliable than relay-based systems, largely because of the robustness of their<br />

solid-state components. PLCs save installation, troubleshooting, and labor<br />

costs by reducing the wiring and the associated wiring errors. They occupy<br />

less space and their reprogrammability features increased flexibility and<br />

simplicity with regard to changing control schemes. On the other hand,<br />

PLC-based automation was considered a centralized implementation, which<br />

has its own loopholes such as central failure. Consequently, a need to break<br />

down the control process into “cells” was found as another alternative to<br />

improve flexibility (e.g., decentralization of centrally regulated tasks) further.<br />

This in turn led to a more decentralized approach to control solutions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!