21.02.2014 Views

88 ON q-LAPLACE TRANSFORMS OF A GENERAL CLASS OF q ...

88 ON q-LAPLACE TRANSFORMS OF A GENERAL CLASS OF q ...

88 ON q-LAPLACE TRANSFORMS OF A GENERAL CLASS OF q ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ON</strong> q-<strong>LAPLACE</strong> <strong>TRANSFORMS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> A <strong>GENERAL</strong> <strong>CLASS</strong>... 85<br />

2. Main Result<br />

This section envisage to derive a theorem involving the q-Laplace transforms<br />

of the general class of q-Polynomials and certain basic hypergeometric functions.<br />

Interestingly, some of the results are obtained in terms of the q-analogue of the<br />

Kampé-de-Fériet functions.<br />

Theorem 1. Let f n,N (x k ; q) be the family of q-Polynomials defined in terms of<br />

a sequence S j,q (.) of complex coefficients, then the following result involving the<br />

q-Laplace transform of the x λ -weighted family of q-Polynomials holds:<br />

{<br />

qL s x λ f n,N (x k ; q) } [n/N]<br />

(1 − q)λ ∑<br />

[ ] ( ) kj<br />

n 1 − q<br />

=<br />

s λ+1<br />

S<br />

Nj j,q Γ q (kj + λ + 1),<br />

j=0<br />

q<br />

s<br />

(2.1)<br />

where Re(k + λ + 1) > 0, λ > 0, k ∈ I, and N is a positive integer.<br />

Proof. We employ (1.9) and (1.22) in the left hand side of the result (2.1), to<br />

obtain<br />

{<br />

qL s x λ f n,N (x k ; q) } = (q; q) ∑ ∞<br />

∞ q i(1+λ) [n/N]<br />

∑<br />

[ ] ( )<br />

n q<br />

i kj<br />

s λ+1<br />

·<br />

S<br />

(q; q) i Nj n,q ,<br />

q<br />

s<br />

i=0<br />

On interchanging the order of summations and summing the resulting inner 0 Φ 0 (.)<br />

series with the help of a result Gasper and Rahman [7], namely,<br />

we obtain<br />

(q; q) ∞<br />

s 1+λ<br />

0Φ 0 (−; −; q, x) =<br />

[n/N]<br />

∑<br />

j=0<br />

j=0<br />

S n,q<br />

(q 1+kj+λ ; q) ∞<br />

·<br />

[<br />

n<br />

Nj<br />

1<br />

(x; q) ∞<br />

, (2.2)<br />

]<br />

q<br />

( 1<br />

s<br />

) kj<br />

,<br />

This, after certain simplifications reduces to the right hand side of (2.1).<br />

(1 − q) λ [n/N]<br />

∑<br />

[ ] ( ) kj<br />

n 1 − q<br />

s λ+1<br />

S<br />

Nj n,q Γ q (kj + λ + 1). (2.3)<br />

q<br />

s<br />

j=0<br />

3. Special Cases<br />

It is interesting to observe that in view of the definitions (1.23)-(1.26), the<br />

Theorem 2.1 leads to the q-Laplace transforms of the above mentioned polynomials<br />

after implementing the necessary changes in the values of S j,q , N and k. We<br />

illustrate the following cases:<br />

(i) If we take N = 1, k = 1 and S j,q = (q; q) 0 in Theorem 2.1, we obtain the<br />

q-Laplace transform of the q-Rogers-Szegö polynomial h n (x ; q) as<br />

{<br />

qL s x λ h n (x ; q) } = 1 ∑ n [ ]<br />

n<br />

s λ+1<br />

(q; q)<br />

j<br />

j (q 1+j ; q) λ (1/s) j . (3.1)<br />

q<br />

j=0<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!