29.10.2012 Views

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

184<br />

27 For instance, Burton, arguably the most prominent and vocal among artists who espoused this<br />

utilitarianism in public art, once said of his street tables and seating design for the Equitable<br />

Assurance Building in New York City: “The social questions interest me more than the art<br />

ones. ... Communal social values are now more important. What office workers do in their<br />

lunch hour is more important than my pushing the limits of my self-expression.” As quoted in<br />

Douglas C. McGill, “Sculpture Goes Public,” New York Times Magazine (April 27, 1986): 67.<br />

28 Such practices are predicated on the conception of the site of art as mobilized and unfixed.<br />

As such, the site is not only a venue of presentation but constitutes a mode of distribution as<br />

well. I have described this kind of deterritorialized site as a “discursive site.” See chapter 1.<br />

29 Richard Serra, “Rigging,” interview with Gerard Hovagymyan, in Richard Serra: Interviews, Etc.<br />

1970–1980 (Yonkers, N.Y.: Hudson River Museum, 1980), 128.<br />

30 General Services Administration Factsheet Concerning the Art-in-Architecture Program for<br />

Federal Buildings, in Martha Buskirk and Clara Weyergraf-Serra, eds., The Destruction of<br />

Tilted Arc: Documents (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991), 23.<br />

31 See Douglas Crimp, “Serra’s Public Sculpture: Redefining Site Specificity,” in Richard Serra:<br />

Sculpture (New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1986), 40–56; and Deutsch, Evictions, 257–270.<br />

32 Deutsche, Evictions, 261.<br />

33 “Political” site specificity is Deutsche’s term, used to distinguish it from “academic” site<br />

specificity. Ibid., 261–262.<br />

34 Richard Serra, “Tilted Arc Destroyed” (1989), reprinted in Richard Serra, Writings Interviews<br />

(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 193–213.<br />

35 See Rosalyn Deutsche’s critique of the conflation between permanence and universal time-<br />

lessness during the Tilted Arc hearings, in Evictions, 264. See also Douglas Crimp’s interview<br />

comments in “Douglas Crimp on Tilted Arc,” in Tom Finklepearl, ed., Dialogues in Public Art<br />

(Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000), 71.<br />

36 Serra, “Tilted Arc Destroyed,” 202.<br />

37 Ibid.<br />

38 Ibid., 203.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!