ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop
ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop
ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
184<br />
27 For instance, Burton, arguably the most prominent and vocal among artists who espoused this<br />
utilitarianism in public art, once said of his street tables and seating design for the Equitable<br />
Assurance Building in New York City: “The social questions interest me more than the art<br />
ones. ... Communal social values are now more important. What office workers do in their<br />
lunch hour is more important than my pushing the limits of my self-expression.” As quoted in<br />
Douglas C. McGill, “Sculpture Goes Public,” New York Times Magazine (April 27, 1986): 67.<br />
28 Such practices are predicated on the conception of the site of art as mobilized and unfixed.<br />
As such, the site is not only a venue of presentation but constitutes a mode of distribution as<br />
well. I have described this kind of deterritorialized site as a “discursive site.” See chapter 1.<br />
29 Richard Serra, “Rigging,” interview with Gerard Hovagymyan, in Richard Serra: Interviews, Etc.<br />
1970–1980 (Yonkers, N.Y.: Hudson River Museum, 1980), 128.<br />
30 General Services Administration Factsheet Concerning the Art-in-Architecture Program for<br />
Federal Buildings, in Martha Buskirk and Clara Weyergraf-Serra, eds., The Destruction of<br />
Tilted Arc: Documents (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991), 23.<br />
31 See Douglas Crimp, “Serra’s Public Sculpture: Redefining Site Specificity,” in Richard Serra:<br />
Sculpture (New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1986), 40–56; and Deutsch, Evictions, 257–270.<br />
32 Deutsche, Evictions, 261.<br />
33 “Political” site specificity is Deutsche’s term, used to distinguish it from “academic” site<br />
specificity. Ibid., 261–262.<br />
34 Richard Serra, “Tilted Arc Destroyed” (1989), reprinted in Richard Serra, Writings Interviews<br />
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 193–213.<br />
35 See Rosalyn Deutsche’s critique of the conflation between permanence and universal time-<br />
lessness during the Tilted Arc hearings, in Evictions, 264. See also Douglas Crimp’s interview<br />
comments in “Douglas Crimp on Tilted Arc,” in Tom Finklepearl, ed., Dialogues in Public Art<br />
(Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000), 71.<br />
36 Serra, “Tilted Arc Destroyed,” 202.<br />
37 Ibid.<br />
38 Ibid., 203.