29.10.2012 Views

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

194<br />

their project was met within the context of “Culture in Action,” and that if the artists were<br />

interested in pursuing it further they should find another source of support. Even though True<br />

Test agreed to “host” the project in spring 1994 (over six months after the exhibition’s closing),<br />

Sculpture Chicago felt that, without a promotional tie-in to a major cultural event, the<br />

meaning of the project would be completely lost to the random paint customer, resulting in a<br />

waste of time and money for all involved. The artists accused Sculpture Chicago of using<br />

them and the community resident group for its own public relations purposes, and charged<br />

that the overall conceptual frame of “Culture in Action” was hypocritical. Sculpture Chicago in<br />

turn viewed the artists as inflexible and impractical.<br />

To ameliorate the situation, Sculpture Chicago considered a “kill fee” for the project<br />

(though this did not materialize) and, at the insistence of the artists, paid the resident group<br />

$3,000 for their involvement in “Culture in Action.” But the situation was further exacerbated<br />

when Ericson and Ziegler refused to contribute any materials to the exhibition catalogue,<br />

which they deemed another form of Sculpture Chicago’s self-promotion. This refusal led<br />

Sculpture Chicago to solicit the assistance of Kelly Rogers of the Sidley Austin law office to<br />

clarify that the artists had a legal obligation to provide materials for the catalogue. In the end,<br />

it seems no one wanted to pursue a legal battle, and the artists reluctantly contributed their<br />

work to the catalogue, quibbling over the wording of certain aspects of the project description<br />

as authored by Mary Jane Jacob.<br />

19 See chapter 3, note 58, on the discursive genesis of new genre public art.<br />

20 Suzanne Lacy, “Cultural Pilgrimages and Metaphoric Journeys,” in Lacy, ed., Mapping the<br />

Terrain, 19.<br />

21 Ibid., 20.<br />

22 Arlene Raven, ed., Art in the Public Interest (1989; New York: Da Capo Press, 1993).<br />

23 Ibid., 1.<br />

24 Ibid., 4.<br />

25 Ibid., 18.<br />

26 Lacy, “Cultural Pilgrimages,” 25.<br />

27 Ibid., 20.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!