ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop
ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop
ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
194<br />
their project was met within the context of “Culture in Action,” and that if the artists were<br />
interested in pursuing it further they should find another source of support. Even though True<br />
Test agreed to “host” the project in spring 1994 (over six months after the exhibition’s closing),<br />
Sculpture Chicago felt that, without a promotional tie-in to a major cultural event, the<br />
meaning of the project would be completely lost to the random paint customer, resulting in a<br />
waste of time and money for all involved. The artists accused Sculpture Chicago of using<br />
them and the community resident group for its own public relations purposes, and charged<br />
that the overall conceptual frame of “Culture in Action” was hypocritical. Sculpture Chicago in<br />
turn viewed the artists as inflexible and impractical.<br />
To ameliorate the situation, Sculpture Chicago considered a “kill fee” for the project<br />
(though this did not materialize) and, at the insistence of the artists, paid the resident group<br />
$3,000 for their involvement in “Culture in Action.” But the situation was further exacerbated<br />
when Ericson and Ziegler refused to contribute any materials to the exhibition catalogue,<br />
which they deemed another form of Sculpture Chicago’s self-promotion. This refusal led<br />
Sculpture Chicago to solicit the assistance of Kelly Rogers of the Sidley Austin law office to<br />
clarify that the artists had a legal obligation to provide materials for the catalogue. In the end,<br />
it seems no one wanted to pursue a legal battle, and the artists reluctantly contributed their<br />
work to the catalogue, quibbling over the wording of certain aspects of the project description<br />
as authored by Mary Jane Jacob.<br />
19 See chapter 3, note 58, on the discursive genesis of new genre public art.<br />
20 Suzanne Lacy, “Cultural Pilgrimages and Metaphoric Journeys,” in Lacy, ed., Mapping the<br />
Terrain, 19.<br />
21 Ibid., 20.<br />
22 Arlene Raven, ed., Art in the Public Interest (1989; New York: Da Capo Press, 1993).<br />
23 Ibid., 1.<br />
24 Ibid., 4.<br />
25 Ibid., 18.<br />
26 Lacy, “Cultural Pilgrimages,” 25.<br />
27 Ibid., 20.