29.10.2012 Views

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

constitution of the public sphere and not with the community per se.<br />

46 Critical Art Ensemble, Electronic Civil Disobedience and Other Unpopular Ideas (Brooklyn,<br />

N.Y.: Autonomedia, 1996), 43–44.<br />

47 Ibid., 45.<br />

48 The mode of practice favored by CAE is nomadic and tactical, outside institutionally sanctioned<br />

forms, spaces, and contexts. Very much informed by situationist strategies, they have<br />

abandoned the belief in the realistic possibility of a mass social revolution but continue to<br />

believe in the power of small “subversive” acts that can provide momentary disruptions in the<br />

everyday maintenance of the rationalized order of society. The language of their avantgardism<br />

tends to be strident if not militaristic.<br />

49 The Rockefeller Foundation’s Project Against Community Tension (PACT) is an example of this<br />

trend. See Iñigo Manglano-Ovalle, “Who Made Us the Target of Your Outreach?,” High<br />

Performance (Winter 1994): 15–16.<br />

50 Jean-Luc Nancy, “Of Being-in-Common,” in Miami Theory Collective, ed., Community at Loose<br />

Ends, 4.<br />

51 Ibid.<br />

52 Van Den Abbeele, introduction to Community at Loose Ends, xiv. La communauté désoeuvrée<br />

is the original French title of Jean-Luc Nancy’s collection of essays on the community (Paris:<br />

Christian Bourgois Editeur, 1986). The three essays in the French edition plus two additional<br />

essays comprise the English edition of Nancy’s work, in which the word désoeuvrée is trans-<br />

lated as “inoperative.” See Jean-Luc Nancy, The Inoperative Community (Minneapolis:<br />

University of Minnesota Press, 1991).<br />

53 In some respects, the one remaining project from “Culture in Action,” which I have not dis-<br />

cussed thus far, marks an impossibility of community, but only by default and only in a highly<br />

unproductive manner. In adopting a polling model of social interaction and communication,<br />

Robert Peters’s phone survey project further individualizes such processes and reduces the<br />

possible discourses on community and difference to “yes” and “no” options. See Culture in<br />

Action, exh. cat. (Seattle: Bay Press, 1995), for a detailed description of the project.<br />

54 I am extrapolating from cultural theorist Linda Singer’s proposal that we can think of the com-<br />

munity not as a referential sign but as a call or appeal to a collective praxis. Linda Singer, as<br />

207<br />

NOTES TO PAGES 149–154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!