29.10.2012 Views

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

ONE PLACE AFTER ANOTHER - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

200<br />

63 See Mary Jane Jacob’s interview with Annette DiMeo Carlozzi, “Questioning the Questioner,”<br />

Art Papers 21, no. 3 (May/June 1997): 8–13.<br />

64 See the comments of Ukeles in her conversation with Doug Ashford, “Democracy Is Empty,”<br />

Documents 10 (Fall 1997): 23–30. According to Ukeles, these types of “curatorial assign-<br />

ments” are usually conceived in reductive terms, as “self-esteem workshops” or “community<br />

fix-up” projects.<br />

65 Christopher Sperandio in conversation with the author, November 7, 1995.<br />

66 Letter from Mary Jane Jacob to Elaine Reichek dated September 1992. My description of<br />

Reichek’s proposal in the preceding paragraph is derived from the artist’s communication<br />

(semiofficial, including a preliminary budget for the project) to Mary Jane Jacob dated August<br />

7, 1992. In addition to Reichek, other artists approached for “Culture in Action” in the early<br />

stages of its planning include Mary Ellen Carroll, Mel Chin, Alfredo Jaar, and Renée Green.<br />

These artists were not included in the exhibition for reasons ranging from scheduling problems<br />

to practicalities of the proposals to ideological differences. On Green’s exchange with<br />

Sculpture Chicago, see chapter 5.<br />

67 Mark Dion, undated and unpublished statement prepared for a public presentation on his<br />

project in early 1993. The statement is particularly interesting for the ways that the “site” is<br />

conceived as available social relations. The overall framing of Dion’s statement is to clarify his<br />

notion of an “integrated [art] practice.”<br />

68 Gamble, “Reframing a Movement,” 22.<br />

69 Manglano-Ovalle removed himself from the position of director of Street-Level Video soon<br />

after the conclusion of “Culture in Action,” leaving the responsibility of sustaining the project<br />

to the younger participants, who came to view themselves as artists in their own right. The<br />

current mission statement of Street-Level Youth Media found on its website expands on many<br />

of the original objectives: “Street-Level Youth Media educates Chicago’s inner-city youth in<br />

media arts and emerging technologies for use in self-expression, communication and social<br />

change. Street-Level’s programs build self-esteem and critical thinking skills for urban youth<br />

who have been historically neglected by policy makers and mass media. Using video production,<br />

computer art and the Internet, Street-Level’s young people address community<br />

issues, access advanced communication technology and gain inclusion in our informationbased<br />

society.” According to the website, over 1,200 youths in neighborhoods across Chicago<br />

participated in its programs in 2000. Interestingly, there is no mention of “Culture in Action”<br />

in the narrative regarding the program’s history. The 1993 street video installation and block

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!