26.02.2014 Views

The Ecological Footprint of Campo Grande - Global Footprint Network

The Ecological Footprint of Campo Grande - Global Footprint Network

The Ecological Footprint of Campo Grande - Global Footprint Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Executive summary<br />

<strong>Campo</strong> <strong>Grande</strong>’s <strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Footprint</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> average <strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Footprint</strong> <strong>of</strong> an inhabitant <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Campo</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> is 3.14 global hectares. That means that if everyone<br />

in the world were to consume in the same way as <strong>Campo</strong> <strong>Grande</strong><br />

dwellers, almost two planets would be needed to keep up their style<br />

<strong>of</strong> living.<br />

To adequately supply the 787,204 inhabitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>Campo</strong> <strong>Grande</strong><br />

with renewable natural resources, an area corresponding to<br />

2,471,821 global hectares would be needed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> city’s <strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Footprint</strong> is 8% bigger than the Brazilian<br />

one, 10% higher than the footprint for the state <strong>of</strong> Mato Grosso<br />

do Sul and 14% larger than the world average. In turn, the state<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mato Grosso do Sul’s footprint is 3% larger than the Brazilian<br />

average which is 2.9 global hectares per person.<br />

On comparing ecological resources we can see that the<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> resources in <strong>Campo</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> is similar to the overall<br />

Brazilian pattern in the its distribution average and it mainly<br />

calls for areas <strong>of</strong> pastureland , cropland and forests. <strong>The</strong>re is less<br />

pressure for CO2 absorption than the global average mainly due to<br />

the low emissions associated to the energy matrix and the intensive<br />

use <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>uels in Brazil (figure 2).<br />

3,50<br />

3,00<br />

Figure 2: Comparisons<br />

by ecological resources in<br />

gha/capita<br />

Key<br />

2,50<br />

2,00<br />

1,50<br />

1,00<br />

0,50<br />

Energy and CO 2<br />

Absorption<br />

Built up Areas<br />

Fisheries<br />

Forests<br />

Pastures<br />

Agriculture<br />

0.0<br />

<strong>Campo</strong><br />

<strong>Grande</strong><br />

Mato Grosso<br />

do Sul<br />

Brazil<br />

World<br />

<strong>Campo</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> <strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Footprint</strong> 2012 p. 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!