07.03.2014 Views

VALLAURIS II CLO PLC - Irish Stock Exchange

VALLAURIS II CLO PLC - Irish Stock Exchange

VALLAURIS II CLO PLC - Irish Stock Exchange

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Class IV Mezzanine Notes, the Subordinated Notes and the Structured Combination Notes<br />

would likely be considered to have substantial equity features under the Plan Assets Regulation, and<br />

the Issuer does not intend to limit the value of the interests held by benefit plan investors in each<br />

class of Notes to below 25 per cent. However, as (i) no employee benefit plan as defined in Section<br />

3(3) of ERISA which is subject to ERISA, (ii) no plan as defined in Section 4975(e)(1) of the Code<br />

which is subject to Section 4975 of the Code and (iii) no entity whose underlying assets include ‘‘plan<br />

assets’’ by reason of such plan’s investment of the entity (collectively, ‘‘ERISA Plans’’) shall be<br />

permitted to acquire Class IV Mezzanine Notes, the Subordinated Notes and the Structured<br />

Combination Notes in the initial offering or thereafter, the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited<br />

transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code will not be applicable to the Issuer or<br />

to any other benefit plan investors who invest in the Class IV Mezzanine Notes, the Subordinated<br />

Notes or Structured Combination Notes. Therefore, provided no ERISA Plans acquire Class IV<br />

Mezzanine Notes, the Subordinated Notes or the Structured Combination Notes, even if other types<br />

of benefit plan investors hold 25 per cent. of the value of the Class IV Mezzanine Notes or one or<br />

more classes of Subordinated Notes or Structured Combination Notes, the assets of the Issuer should<br />

not be deemed plan assets under the Plan Asset Regulations for purposes of ERISA or Section 4975<br />

of the Code.<br />

In determining whether or not a benefit plan investor is an ERISA Plan, life insurance company<br />

general accounts (both U.S. and non-U.S.) should consider the effect of the U.S. Supreme Court’s<br />

decision in John Hancock Life Insurance Co. v. Harris Trust and Savings Bank, 510 U.S. 86 (1993),<br />

which held that those funds allocated to the general account of an insurance company pursuant to<br />

contracts which vary with the investment experience of the insurance company’s general account and<br />

are attributable to ERISA Plans are considered to be ‘‘plan assets’’. Despite the presence of such<br />

contracts attributable to ERISA Plans invested in the general account, if the insurance company<br />

complies with certain regulations issued by the Department of Labor under ERISA Section 401(c), it<br />

will not be deemed to hold the plan assets of any ERISA Plans. However, any separate account<br />

funds held on behalf of an ERISA Plan by a life insurance company (whether held in or outside of<br />

the U.S.) would generally be considered to be plan assets. Any benefit plan investor, including a life<br />

insurance company general account, should consult with its counsel in determining whether or not it<br />

is an ERISA Plan prior to investing in the Class IV Mezzanine Notes, the Subordinated Notes or the<br />

Structured Combination Notes.<br />

Despite the prohibition upon, and the procedures employed to prevent, the acquisition of the<br />

Class IV Mezzanine Notes, the Subordinated Notes and the Structured Combination Notes by<br />

ERISA Plans, there can be no assurances that an ERISA Plan will not in fact acquire Class IV<br />

Mezzanine Notes, Subordinated Notes or Structured Combination Notes in violation of such<br />

restriction. In such an event, if the total value of the Class IV Mezzanine Notes, the Subordinated<br />

Notes or the Structured Combination Notes in one or more classes held by benefit plan investors<br />

(both ERISA Plans and non-ERISA plans) were to equal or exceed 25 per cent., the assets of the<br />

Issuer could be deemed plan assets.<br />

If, for any reason the assets of the Issuer are deemed to be ‘‘plan assets’’ of an ERISA Plan,<br />

then, among other possible adverse results, certain transactions the Issuer might enter into, or may<br />

have entered into, in the ordinary course of its business might constitute non-exempt ‘‘prohibited<br />

transactions’’ under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code and might have to be<br />

rescinded. The Collateral Manager, as a person with discretionary authority to manage the assets of<br />

the Issuer, would probably be deemed an ERISA fiduciary. As a result, the Collateral Manager may<br />

be prevented from making certain investments on behalf of the Issuer (as not being deemed consistent<br />

with the ERISA prudent investment standards) or engaging in certain transactions or fee<br />

arrangements because they may cause non-exempt prohibited transactions.<br />

BY ITS PURCHASE OR HOLDING OF A CLASS IV MEZZANINE NOTE, A<br />

SUBORDINATED NOTE OR A STRUCTURED COMBINATION NOTE, OR ANY INTEREST<br />

THEREIN, THE PURCHASER AND/OR HOLDER THEREOF AND EACH TRANSFEREE<br />

WILL BE REQUIRED OR WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE REPRESENTED, WARRANTED<br />

AND AGREED THAT, AT THE TIME OF ITS ACQUISITION, AND THROUGHOUT THE<br />

PERIOD THAT IT HOLDS SUCH CLASS IV MEZZANINE NOTE, SUBORDINATED NOTE<br />

238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!