08.03.2014 Views

UN Sanctions Reform - The Watson Institute for International Studies

UN Sanctions Reform - The Watson Institute for International Studies

UN Sanctions Reform - The Watson Institute for International Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Workshop on <strong>UN</strong> <strong>Sanctions</strong> 16-17 July 2004<br />

4. Advancing the Targeted <strong>Sanctions</strong> Agenda and Workshop Evaluation<br />

At the conclusion of the workshop, participants were provided the opportunity to give<br />

feedback on the kinds of issues that would benefit from discussion in possible future<br />

workshops, in addition to assessing the success of the workshop in achieving the stated<br />

goals. Through a general plenary discussion and written evaluations, participants’ views<br />

were sought on the full range of substantive and administrative matters in planning the<br />

workshop.<br />

Continuing to advance our understanding of targeted sanctions:<br />

Substantive ideas <strong>for</strong> future discussion<br />

In the course of workshop discussions, and especially in the concluding plenary,<br />

presenters and participants raised a number of key substantive issues to be addressed in<br />

moving <strong>for</strong>ward with the targeted sanctions agenda. <strong>The</strong>se may be grouped under two<br />

headings:<br />

(1) Building on the sanctions re<strong>for</strong>m processes to refine the targeted sanctions tool<br />

Participants all acknowledged the utility of the recommendations put <strong>for</strong>ward as part of<br />

the sanctions re<strong>for</strong>m processes. Indeed, many of the specific findings of the processes<br />

have been implemented in practice. However, participants also reflected that these<br />

recommendations are now up to five years old. <strong>The</strong> interceding period has revealed areas<br />

in which further refinements to the targeted sanctions tool are needed. For example, the<br />

effectiveness of current listing and delisting processes could be improved. Specifically,<br />

there may be a need to evaluate the kinds of in<strong>for</strong>mation used to justify inclusion on lists,<br />

and the procedures <strong>for</strong> delisting. Regarding Expert Panels, there would be some benefit<br />

in analyzing the capability and utility of including humanitarian assessments in the<br />

experts’ mandates. Further, questions have emerged regarding the sequencing of<br />

sanctions measures. To improve leverage over the targets, multiple resolutions could be<br />

used in imposing different kinds of targeted sanctions (perhaps initiated with targeted<br />

financial sanctions, which require timely passage and implementation). In these and<br />

other areas, <strong>for</strong>mer targets of sanctions may be a useful source of in<strong>for</strong>mation about the<br />

effects of sanctions.<br />

While new questions have arisen regarding the operation of targeted sanctions, others are<br />

enduring, suggesting that new ways of approaching issues be considered. For example,<br />

participants observed that the international community is yet to develop mechanisms to<br />

improve the capacity of Members States to implement targeted sanctions.<br />

(2) Targeted sanctions in an evolving political context<br />

Again pointing to the passage of time since the findings of the sanctions re<strong>for</strong>m processes<br />

were published, participants noted that the broader context in which targeted sanctions<br />

are implemented has changed, giving rise to a number of novel challenges. For example,<br />

we have little experience in the role that targeted sanctions ought to play in considering<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!