PDF, U.S. letter size, portrait/vertical document
PDF, U.S. letter size, portrait/vertical document
PDF, U.S. letter size, portrait/vertical document
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Tribunale di Vigevano: Specific Aspects of the CISG Uniformly Dealt With<br />
exceptional cases 88 - have recourse to domestic law. 89 This point of view also has been<br />
taken up by a number of courts. 90 There is, however, no agreement among these legal<br />
writers as to how to determine the applicable domestic law. Whereas some legal writers<br />
hold the view that one should always resort to the lex fori, 91 others propose to resort to<br />
the domestic law made applicable by virtue of the rules of private international law of the<br />
forum. 92<br />
The prevailing view, however, appears to be that the issue of burden of proof is a matter 30<br />
governed by the CISG 93 (at least “implicitly” 94 or “indirectly” 95 ). This view has been justified,<br />
on the one hand, on the grounds that the CISG itself provides at least one rule on<br />
the allocation of the burden [page 237] of proof, 96 namely the one to be found in Article<br />
79(1). 97 Thus, it cannot be asserted that the issue of the allocation of the burden of proof<br />
is not governed by the CISG. On the other hand, legal scholars have pointed out that the<br />
issue of burden of proof is so closely linked to the substantive law that a rule on the allocation<br />
of the burden of proof must necessarily be derived from the substantive law, i.e. the<br />
88 See, e.g., MAX HUTTER, DIE HAFTUNG DES VERKÄUFERS FÜR NICHTLIEFERUNG DER WARE<br />
BZW. LIEFERUNG VERTRAGSWIDRIGER WARE NACH DEM WIENER UNCITRAL-ÜBEREINKOMMEN<br />
ÜBER INTERNATIONALE WARENKAUFVERTRÄGE VOM 11 April 1980 44 (Diss. Regensburg 1988).<br />
89 Warren L.H. Khoo, Art. 2, in COMMENTARY ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALES LAW, supra note 25, at<br />
39; Ulrich Huber, Der UNCITRAL-Entwurf eines Übereinkommens über internationale Warenkaufverträge,<br />
RABELS ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR AUSLÄNDISCHES UND INTERNATIONALES PRIVATRECHT 413, 479<br />
(1979); GERT REINHART, UN-KAUFRECHT 89 (Heidelberg 1991); Arthur Rosett, Critical Reflections on<br />
the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 45 OHIO STATE L.J. 265,<br />
281 (1984); GRITLI RYFFEL, DIE SCHADENERSATZHAFTUNG DES VERKÄUFERS NACH DEM<br />
WIENER ÜBEREINKOMMEN ÜBER INTERNATIONALE WARENKAUFVERTRÄGE VOM 11 Apri1 1980<br />
59 (Bern 1992).<br />
90 ICC Arbitral Award no. 6653/93, JOURNAL DU DROIT INTERNATIONAL 1044 (1993).<br />
91 Cf. compare Khoo, supra note 89, at 39; Dirk Ott o , Produkthaftung nach dem UN-Kaufrecht,<br />
MONATSSCHRIFT FÜR DEUTSCHES RECHT 533, 534 (1992); RYFFEL, supra note 89, at 59.<br />
92 Cosi Shivbir S. Grewal, Risk of loss in Goods Sold During Transit: A Comparative Study of the United<br />
Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, the Uniform Commercial Code, and<br />
the British Sale of Goods Act, 14 LOY. L.A. INT'L and COMP. L. REV. 93, 102 (1991).<br />
93 Cf. JOACHIM AUE, MÄNGELGEWÄHRLEISTUNG IM UN-KAUFRECHT 110 (Frankfurt 1989); Cesare<br />
Massimo Bianca, Art. 36, in COMMENTARY ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALES LAW, supra note 25, at<br />
287-288; Victor Knap p , Art. 74, in COMMENTARY ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALES LAW, supra note<br />
25, at 541; Rolf Herber, Anwendungsbereich des UNCITRAL-Kaufrechtsübereinkommens, in DAS<br />
UNCITRAL-KAUFRECHT IM VERGLEICH ZUM ÖSTERREICHISCHEN RECHT, supra note 74, at 41;<br />
HERBER and CZERWENKA, supra note 24, at 32; JUNG, supra note 87, at 40; Ulrich Magnus, Stand und<br />
Entwicklung des UN-Kaufrechts, ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR EUROPÄISCHES PRIVATRECHT 202, 207 (1995);<br />
REIMERS-ZOCHER, supra note 87, at 148.<br />
94 HG Zürich, 9 September 1993, UNILEX.<br />
95 Oskar Hartwieg, Prozessuale Aspekte einheitlicher Anwendung der Wiener UN-Konvention über den<br />
Internationalen Warenkauf (CISG). Eine komparative Fall-Studie zur einheitlichen Rechtsanwendung,<br />
ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR VERGLEICHENDE RECHTSWISSENSCHAFT 282, 321 (1993).<br />
96 MAGNUS, supra note 13, at 122.<br />
97 See also REIMERS-ZOCHER, supra note 87, at 146 ff.<br />
SiSU cisgw3.law.pace.edu/ 12