AMIODARONE OR DIGOXIN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

RHYTHM CONTROL 1 Conversion to NSR either by electrical (DCC) or pharmacological (AAD) cardioversion. Haemodynamically unstable: Electrical Haemodynamically stable: Either Electrical conversion Preferred: greater efficacy (85% vs 45%) and low proarrhythmic risk. But required generalized anaethesia
RATE CONTROL 1 Slowing AV conduction Slow ventricular response rate → better ventricular filling with blood. If intolerable to S/E of rate-control agent Combining lower-dose digoxin + B-blockers/CCBs Amiodarone effective for patient who are not cardioverted to NSR. Good control: Rest: 60-80 bpm, Moderate: 90-115 bpm
Page 1 and 2: UNIT FARMASI KLINIKAL (UFK), HUSM.
Page 3 and 4: OBJECTIVES
Page 5 and 6: INTRODUCTION DEFINTION CLASSIFICATI
Page 7 and 8: CLASSIFICATION 1 (1) First Detected
Page 9 and 10: CLASSIFICATION 2,3 (3) CLASS ACTION
Page 11: MANAGEMENT 1,2 (1) 3 Objectives:
Page 15 and 16: MANAGEMENT 2 (3) Haemodynamically
Page 17 and 18: MANAGEMENT 2 (5)
Page 19 and 20: MANAGEMENT 2 (7)
Page 21 and 22: Drug Digoxin (Misc) RATE CONTROL AG
Page 23 and 24: RHYTHM CONTROL AGENT 1,2 Drug Recom
Page 25 and 26: MANAGEMENT 2 (8) HEPARIN LMWH HEPAR
Page 28 and 29: DISCUSSION AMIODARONE OR DIGOXIN ?
Page 30 and 31: AMIODARONE (2) Study Peuhkurinen 4
Page 32 and 33: DIGOXIN 8 (1) Digitalis glycosides
Page 34 and 35: AMIODARONE VS DIGOXIN (1) Study Yea
Page 36 and 37: AMIODARONE VS DIGOXIN (3) Study Yea
Page 38 and 39: CONCLUSION
Page 40 and 41: REFERENCES

AMIODARONE OR DIGOXIN

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?