23.03.2014 Views

Flora & Fauna Survey & Ecological Assessment (pdf. 5MB)

Flora & Fauna Survey & Ecological Assessment (pdf. 5MB)

Flora & Fauna Survey & Ecological Assessment (pdf. 5MB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Flora</strong> & <strong>Fauna</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> & <strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>s – 35 Water Street Wahroonga<br />

areas within Lane Cove National Park and Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park. Therefore the small area<br />

of habitat potentially affected by subdivision potential envisaged under the Proposal (173 sq metres)<br />

is not essential habitat for the species.<br />

(e) “…whether the action proposed is likely to have an adverse effect on critical habitat (either directly or<br />

indirectly)…”<br />

The Subject Property is not listed as critical habitat under Part 3 Division 1 of the TSC Act. Therefore,<br />

no critical habitat would be adversely affected by the draft Proposal.<br />

(f) “…whether the action proposed is consistent with the objectives or actions of a recovery plan or threat<br />

abatement plan…”<br />

No Recovery Plans or Threat Abatement Plans (either finalised or draft) have been prepared for the<br />

Gang-gang Cockatoo. However, DECCW has identified a number of priority actions for these species<br />

(DECCW 2009b).<br />

Actions which may be relevant to the management of habitat for the Gang Gang Cockatoo on the<br />

Subject Property include:<br />

Development of a strategy that includes street tree or other plantings, which include browse<br />

plant species within reserves and private residences.<br />

(g) “…whether the action proposed constitutes or is part of a key threatening process or is likely to result in<br />

the operation of, or increase the impact of, a key threatening process...”<br />

The following key threatened processes as they potentially impact on the Gang Gang Cockatoo may<br />

be applicable to the Subject Property:<br />

Clearing of native vegetation, as this will clear foraging habitat. However, potential nesting sites<br />

and other potential foraging habitat will be retained elsewhere on the Subject Property;<br />

Competition from feral honeybees, as they can form hives in tree hollows that also form<br />

potential nesting habitat for the Gang-gang Cockatoo. The Proposal is not likely to exacerbate<br />

this process;<br />

<strong>Ecological</strong> consequences of high frequency fires, as fire can destroy tree hollows that form<br />

potential nesting habitat. It is envisaged that fire will not be part of the management of the<br />

BGHF Habitat on the Subject Property;<br />

Infection by Psittacine circoviral (beak and feather) disease affecting endangered psittacine<br />

species and populations, as it can leave Gang-gang Cockatoos prone to other infections.<br />

However, the Proposal will not exacerbate the likelihood of this disease infecting a local<br />

population;<br />

Predation by the European Red Fox as fledglings can become prey items for foxes. Foxes may<br />

occur or visit the Subject Property from time to time (although not recorded), but are not likely<br />

to be increased in number by the Proposal; and<br />

The removal of dead wood and dead trees, as dead trees are often hollow and contain potential<br />

nesting habitat. Some dead trees may be removed but all trees with hollows will be retained on<br />

the Subject Property.<br />

UBM <strong>Ecological</strong> Consultants Pty Ltd Page 67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!