28.03.2014 Views

isbn9789526046266

isbn9789526046266

isbn9789526046266

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6<br />

Constructivists Say: Knowledge is<br />

Constructed in Context<br />

The central tenet of the educational paradigm known as constructivism is that people actively construct<br />

knowledge rather than passively receive and store ready-made knowledge. Knowledge is not taken in as is<br />

from an external world, and is not a copy of what a textbook or teacher said. Instead, knowledge is unique<br />

to the person or group that constructed it – constructivists differ among themselves as to whether individual<br />

minds or social groups (or both) are the constructing agents. From these premises, constructivist thinkers<br />

have derived pedagogical recommendations which tend to promote active, learner-centered education.<br />

Proponents of constructivism often claim a positive, even revolutionary impact on education; skeptics<br />

either point at perceived flaws in constructivist reasoning or dismiss constructivism as not so much a<br />

revolution as a rephrasing of prevalent wisdoms. These issues notwithstanding, many critics, too, agree<br />

that the currently extremely influential constructivist movement has done good by bringing epistemological<br />

issues to the forefront of educational discussions, by advancing the increasingly widespread recognition of<br />

the social aspects of learning and the importance of learners’ prior knowledge, and by emphasizing active<br />

learning (Phillips, 1995, 2000).<br />

To get an overall feel, let us begin with a list of selected constructivist claims (my phrasings based<br />

on von Glasersfeld, 1982; Phillips, 1995, 2000; Steffe and Gale, 1995; Greening, 1999; Ben-Ari, 2001a;<br />

Larochelle et al., 1998; Rasmussen, 1998; Anderson et al., 2000b; Patton, 2002; Kirschner et al., 2006;<br />

Tobias and Duffy, 2009). These claims range from the epistemological to the pedagogical. Some are<br />

considerably more controversial than others. Not all of the claims are equally, or at all, accepted by all<br />

constructivists.<br />

1. Knowledge is constructed by learners, it is not (and cannot be) transmitted as is.<br />

2. The knowledge that people – or groups of people – have is different from the knowledge of other<br />

people who have ostensibly ‘learned the same thing’.<br />

3. Knowledge construction takes place as prior knowledge interacts with new experience.<br />

4. Knowledge is not derived from, is not about, and does not represent an external, observerindependent<br />

natural reality, but an experiential, personal (or socially shared) ‘reality’.<br />

5. If an extraexperiential reality exists, it is not rationally accessible.<br />

6. There is no objectively correct or incorrect, true or untrue knowledge, only knowledge that is more<br />

or less viable for a purpose.<br />

7. The social and cultural context mediates the construction of knowledge.<br />

8. Effective learning features the learner as an intellectually active constructor of knowledge; good<br />

teaching means facilitating and motivating such construction.<br />

9. Allowing students to leverage their prior knowledge is key to good teaching.<br />

10. Learners should be presented with minimal information and allowed to discover principles and rules<br />

for themselves.<br />

11. Hands-on learner-directed exploration is an effective form of learning.<br />

12. Effective learning requires complex, authentic learning situations. Learners should solve illstructured,<br />

open-ended problems similar to those that experts solve.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!