29.03.2014 Views

University of Oslo Workshops June 29-30 Conference July 1-3 ...

University of Oslo Workshops June 29-30 Conference July 1-3 ...

University of Oslo Workshops June 29-30 Conference July 1-3 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3rd Day, Keynote Presentation 8.<strong>30</strong>-9.<strong>30</strong>, <strong>July</strong> 3, 2010<br />

Time Activities<br />

8.00-16.00 Registration on Entrance floor<br />

08.<strong>30</strong>-09.<strong>30</strong> Keynote Presentation (AK K.H. Aula)<br />

Chair: Pr<strong>of</strong>. Constantinos Papanastasiou<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Jan-Eric Gustafsson,<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Gothenburg<br />

Causal Inference in International Comparative<br />

Research on Student Achievement: Methodological<br />

Challenges and Developments<br />

Summary<br />

Comparative research on student achievement in different educational<br />

systems has during the last couple <strong>of</strong> decades made great progress in<br />

developing and implementing assessments <strong>of</strong> knowledge and skills in<br />

different domains. Through employing advanced measurement and sampling<br />

techniques, surveys make it possible to make confident statements both<br />

about differences in level <strong>of</strong> achievement between educational systems and<br />

about trend over time within educational systems. However, comparatively<br />

less progress has been made in developing theories and models which can<br />

explain the outcomes. Thus, in spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that one aim <strong>of</strong> the<br />

international studies has been to identify cause and effect relations, it<br />

frequently has proven difficult to make credible inferences about causality.<br />

One possible reason for this is that the data necessary for such inferences is<br />

lacking. Another possible reason is that the cross-sectional survey designs<br />

typically employed do not protect against different kinds <strong>of</strong> threats to valid<br />

causal inference. The main aim <strong>of</strong> the presentation is to identify the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

these threats, and to discuss ways to protect against them. First, some<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> problematic inferences are presented. Alternative designs and<br />

analytical methods, and their strengths and weaknesses, are then discussed.<br />

Among these are methods that rely on change observed over time in<br />

aggregated trend data. Another approach relies on multilevel techniques to<br />

analyze relations between units at different levels <strong>of</strong> observation and<br />

aggregation. Yet another approach is estimation by instrumental variables,<br />

which frequently is employed in economic research but has so far only<br />

rarely been used within the field <strong>of</strong> education. It is concluded that more<br />

appropriate data and more sophisticated analytical techniques will support<br />

development <strong>of</strong> credible causal inference about determinants <strong>of</strong> student<br />

achievement.<br />

09.<strong>30</strong>-10.00 C<strong>of</strong>fee break<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!