07.04.2014 Views

Report on Multi-Unit Developments - Law Reform Commission

Report on Multi-Unit Developments - Law Reform Commission

Report on Multi-Unit Developments - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

subject, the authority may form the opini<strong>on</strong>... that planning<br />

permissi<strong>on</strong> should not be granted to the applicant c<strong>on</strong>cerned in<br />

respect of that development.‖ 64<br />

1.50 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> understands that, at the time of writing (June 2008),<br />

secti<strong>on</strong> 35 of the 2000 Act has never been used. This may have been because,<br />

prior to the enactment of the Planning and Development (Strategic<br />

Infrastructure) Act 2006, planning authorities required the approval of the High<br />

Court before refusal under secti<strong>on</strong> 35 could be used.<br />

1.51 The changes made by the 2006 Act allow for a more efficient use of<br />

secti<strong>on</strong> 35 of the 2000 Act and the Commissi<strong>on</strong> welcomes the reference to this<br />

sancti<strong>on</strong> in the Department‘s 2008 Circular. 65 The effect of the changes is that a<br />

developer must apply to the High Court to overturn the decisi<strong>on</strong> to refuse<br />

planning permissi<strong>on</strong> under secti<strong>on</strong> 35. 66 This is likely to lead to actual use of<br />

secti<strong>on</strong> 35 and, at the least, will have persuasive effect when it is known that<br />

planning authorities are less c<strong>on</strong>strained by the restricti<strong>on</strong> imposed by secti<strong>on</strong><br />

35 as originally enacted. Secti<strong>on</strong> 35 is not restricted to the functi<strong>on</strong>al area of a<br />

given planning authority but extends to previous n<strong>on</strong>-compliance in any<br />

planning authority area in the State. 67 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> underlines the need to<br />

ensure informati<strong>on</strong> sharing and co-operati<strong>on</strong> across planning authorities. If this<br />

is d<strong>on</strong>e, rogue developers who have breached planning permissi<strong>on</strong> and have<br />

become subject to secti<strong>on</strong> 35 in <strong>on</strong>e planning area should not, in the future, be<br />

able to avoid the effect of this by moving to develop instead in another planning<br />

authority‘s functi<strong>on</strong>al area (the Commissi<strong>on</strong> is aware from extensive media<br />

discussi<strong>on</strong> that some developers have been able to do this). In this respect, the<br />

Commissi<strong>on</strong> agrees with the view in the Departmental 2008 Circular that<br />

secti<strong>on</strong> 35, as amended, is a potentially useful deterrent which could lead to<br />

higher rates of compliance with planning c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

(3) Warning and Enforcement Notices<br />

1.52 Warning notices and enforcement notices are forms of administrative<br />

sancti<strong>on</strong>s widely used by planning authorities. They act as a relatively mild but<br />

effective means of enforcement. Warning notices are issued ―to warn the<br />

64<br />

S. 35(1), Planning and Development Act 2000.<br />

65<br />

See Annex to Circular Letter PD 1/08, Framework for a Comprehensive Taking in<br />

Charge Policy, paragraph 3.8.<br />

66<br />

S.35(6) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 as amended by s.9 of the<br />

Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act 2006.<br />

67<br />

The language of s.35 does not limit refusal for failure to comply with past<br />

permissi<strong>on</strong> to failure to comply with past permissi<strong>on</strong> from a given local authority.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!