Essays On Gender And Governance - United Nations Development ...
Essays On Gender And Governance - United Nations Development ...
Essays On Gender And Governance - United Nations Development ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Gender</strong> and <strong>Governance</strong> : Concepts and Contexts<br />
for example, political parties allotted less than 15 per cent of the<br />
total number of tickets to women. In fact women constitute only<br />
10-12 per cent of the membership of political parties (Rai, 1997:105).<br />
There has been far more resistance to state and national level<br />
reservations for women by political parties than by the general<br />
public. A survey by India Today indicates that 75 per cent of women<br />
and 79 per cent of men favour the active participation of women in<br />
politics and 75 per cent of men and women favour reservations in<br />
legislative bodies (Rai and Sharma, 2000:159). Opposition from<br />
parties has been both gendered and caste based. The Janata Dal,<br />
Rashtriya Janata Dal (Laloo Prashad Yadav), Samajwadi Janata<br />
Party and Bahujan Samajwadi Party have all opposed the Bill<br />
because it makes no provision for reservations on a caste basis for<br />
other backward classes (OBCs). Among women MPs, a few have<br />
opposed it for this reason but a number of prominent, independent<br />
minded women have strongly supported it.<br />
The women’s movement largely supports the Bill. Indeed it<br />
has more actively and directly intervened in the debate concerning<br />
the 81st Amendment than about the panchayat reforms. Vasantha<br />
and Kalpana Kannabiran, two prominent women’s movement<br />
activists, argue that it is important to look beyond the actions of<br />
the elites who have supported the 81st Amendment. “[...] At a<br />
deeper level, the reason why this negligible group is able to speak<br />
out so loud and clear is because masses of underprivileged women<br />
have a far more important political presence that overruns and<br />
refuses to be contained by the vote bank politics of mainstream<br />
parties” (Kannabiran V. and Kannabiran K., 1997:197).<br />
Opposition to the 81st Amendment from segments of the<br />
women’s movement partly reflects a distrust of political parties.<br />
<strong>On</strong>e worry is that quotas could form a ceiling rather than a<br />
minimum to be improved upon. Another worry is that women<br />
candidates might be pliable because of their dependence on male<br />
party leaders (Kishwar, 1996:2867-2874). An even more significant<br />
worry is that reservations will treat women like a homogeneous<br />
group, which increases the likelihood that the “biwi brigade” of<br />
educated, upper class, upper caste women will be elected,<br />
particularly because the Bill does not provide for sub quotas of<br />
OBCs. 14<br />
14<br />
See Nivedita Menon (2000) and Vasanthi Raman (1995).<br />
45