xs7hy9e06w?redirect_to=http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/wo/blm_library/tech_notes.Par.29872.File.dat/TN_444
xs7hy9e06w?redirect_to=http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/wo/blm_library/tech_notes.Par.29872.File.dat/TN_444
xs7hy9e06w?redirect_to=http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/wo/blm_library/tech_notes.Par.29872.File.dat/TN_444
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.4.2 Minimization<br />
2.4.2.1 Summary of Programmatic<br />
Design Features to be Applied<br />
The Final Solar PEIS identified<br />
a comprehensive suite of required<br />
programmatic design features<br />
that <strong>wo</strong>uld avoid and/or minimize<br />
adverse impacts to resources, either<br />
onsite or through consultation/<br />
coordination with potentially<br />
affected entities. The programmatic<br />
design features are extensive<br />
and are listed in their entirety in<br />
Appendix A of the Solar PEIS ROD<br />
(BLM 2012). These programmatic<br />
design features include required<br />
actions to avoid or minimize<br />
impacts to all of the potentially<br />
impacted resources listed in<br />
Section 2.3.<br />
2.4.2.2 Other Required Impact<br />
Minimization Measures and/or<br />
Stipulations<br />
The Final Solar PEIS also<br />
includes SEZ-specific design<br />
features for all of the SEZs. The SEZspecific<br />
design features identified<br />
for the Dry Lake SEZ were the<br />
following:<br />
Water resources: Groundwater<br />
analyses suggest that full buildout<br />
of dry-cooled and wet-cooled<br />
<strong>tech</strong>nologies is not feasible; for<br />
mixed-<strong>tech</strong>nology development<br />
scenarios, any proposed dry- or<br />
wet-cooled projects should use<br />
water conservation practices.<br />
Wildlife (mammals): The<br />
fencing around the solar energy<br />
development should not block<br />
the free movement of mammals,<br />
particularly big game species.<br />
Cultural resources:<br />
Coordination with the trail<br />
administration for the Old<br />
Spanish Trail and Old Spanish Trail<br />
Association is recommended for<br />
identifying potential mitigation<br />
strategies for avoiding or<br />
minimizing potential impacts on<br />
the congressionally designated<br />
Old Spanish National Historic Trail<br />
and also on any remnants of the<br />
National Register of Historic Placeslisted<br />
sites associated with the<br />
Old Spanish Trail/Mormon Road<br />
that may be located within the<br />
SEZ. Avoidance of the Old Spanish<br />
Trail site within the southeastern<br />
portion of the proposed SEZ is<br />
recommended.<br />
Native American concerns:<br />
The Moapa Band of Paiute Indians<br />
have specifically requested formal<br />
<strong>gov</strong>ernment-to-<strong>gov</strong>ernment<br />
contact when construction or<br />
land management projects are<br />
being proposed on and/or near<br />
the Muddy River, Virgin River,<br />
Colorado River, Arrow Canyon<br />
Range, Potato Woman, and Apex<br />
Pleistocene Lake. Compensatory<br />
programs of mitigation could be<br />
implemented to provide access<br />
to and/or deliberately cultivate<br />
patches of culturally significant<br />
plants within the Dry Lake SEZ<br />
or on other public lands nearby<br />
where tribes have ready access.<br />
The BLM should consider assisting<br />
the Moapa Band of Paiute Indians<br />
with the preparation of forms to<br />
nominate identified sacred places<br />
as traditional cultural properties,<br />
if it is found that all the proper<br />
eligibility requirements are met.<br />
Some additional minimization<br />
measures <strong>wo</strong>uld likely be identified<br />
during preparation of a NEPA<br />
analysis to support a competitive<br />
lease offering within the SEZ.<br />
These measures <strong>wo</strong>uld also be<br />
incorporated into the lease offering<br />
as stipulations. For example, if<br />
any archaeological sites are found<br />
during the cultural resource<br />
inventory (see text box titled Dry<br />
Lake Cultural Resources) and are<br />
determined to be eligible for<br />
listing in the National Register of<br />
Historic Places, onsite mitigation<br />
or avoidance strategies will be<br />
considered during consultation<br />
with the BLM-Nevada state historic<br />
preservation officer and affected<br />
tribes to minimize impacts on<br />
significant cultural resources.<br />
2.4.3 Regional Mitigation<br />
Identifying the impacts of<br />
utility-scale solar development<br />
that may warrant regional<br />
mitigation involves three steps:<br />
(1) identifying all the potential<br />
impacts; (2) identifying which<br />
of the potential impacts are<br />
likely to be unavoidable (i.e., the<br />
impacts that cannot be mitigated<br />
onsite by avoidance and/or the<br />
implementation of design features<br />
meant to minimize the impact);<br />
and (3) identifying which of the<br />
unavoidable impacts may warrant<br />
regional mitigation by taking into<br />
consideration the condition and<br />
trend of the impacted resources<br />
in the region and how they could<br />
be affected by the unavoidable<br />
impacts.<br />
As part of the Dry Lake SRMS<br />
process, a team of specialists from<br />
the BLM Southern Nevada District<br />
Office (called the interdisciplinary<br />
team) reevaluated the potential<br />
impacts of solar development that<br />
were described in the Final Solar<br />
PEIS (see Section 2.3) in the light<br />
of available <strong>dat</strong>a specific to the<br />
SEZ area. This team, along with<br />
other BLM subject matter experts<br />
and Argonne National Laboratory<br />
subject matter experts, followed<br />
the methodology presented in<br />
Sections 2.4.3.1 and 2.4.3.2 for first<br />
identifying unavoidable impacts<br />
from solar development in the<br />
SEZ, and then for identifying the<br />
unavoidable impacts that may<br />
warrant regional mitigation.<br />
REGIONAL MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE DRY LAKE SOLAR ENERGY ZONE • TECHNICAL NOTE <strong>444</strong> • 21